DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 4ACIs6vO058282 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 4ACIs6vO058282 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=QK7TK2CZ X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3D9A6385840B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1731437644; bh=N4ceG6A69zswLCKVZy9KXIS839To/JZ5sGr3cz661Rw=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=QK7TK2CZdJZm4xbCo/ywx/82JH+VGWfdZJpHOnCJzRU1ZdavbenAtBxDfhYF4CsgR zm+zId6pMFzwXAhj9ha0Wt3F5iPPbHHWZ2NxC2zQYJXxIAG7gf2f0UkO6sNCRAjhNR FcHJKb+IrGIdA2UiNrr0ybRxz7zRdz+1UNLVLF1s= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 3FE793858D20 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 3FE793858D20 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1731437595; cv=none; b=b3IBcpYW2ehnR4Ym1PGLL/J7jbfYj56vbSPjOS7bLZ5PQIvyU8HJTYW9uCYu7GXH0NUlGXMLglZrECjQFDDTe43VzSakF+W9x8r0gB/HCHmpE29etN8ljxJgbJhEfKfDmMu4QhBiElMkasZw7SdLiAkW21Kvftb7Cm0Yi/QZPVw= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1731437595; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9eylvyf9TiWnbRh+bJQYih7y9UYPUOlh9Mbfw3Cqnbo=; h=DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To; b=SGEguYXfx9Qd+m71t6TC8stZ1125Lj8gfY2A5lpd9IBmkoVCXAma0M+6CgWHNaJ9uQiQSdXgHhiRUkA+ZkqW3KRlChLpQd7dthWn1lTZ/R2o5GH3VDpf1laLI2L3TgePPyP2jiVb7XkZItWZVewLNmVRICzI8V9RMWOesvCqfQ8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1731437591; x=1732042391; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ermOVvX4HyYFOBg/axHwGY4kTE0i8i8CfD1URbzE46A=; b=hL8bZJhQCjg3fLQoksSfin92v5zbXhvgktTUIlPu7SeCLL1ZUe2GIZo65HoBiPIah1 Vduc6/Uw3Za4ToI6U8Gfd8sG375IyBJnYwo+M71XXvLAFPx+xgtg2Di5ckU1LfH/G1cI ODfeRssWTGb33Z7eBtJBOhfW+IIx3wPOH5sZsxP/dU5C1n+1YtKdTUUpo7mKLA4GN3uw CFG866OrCeIhw7uUhKtXVKY7p8rHNKFFDF1mtx3e4icBHHkP2L7B2ydXkJPFAb2dP0be aSXzBGutI50ClV42DMfue9I3wK0KsV99lhYTRbmi4jciRcQnaXLcVaRb6ZSr0rpRcRLJ 1bSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyia62sKzbwypNgDQEmvLBefRVTET6vQ7yUI1DHdQ429QlqV08Y w1m1YPqhTon1rlNbmaTu7Bn40Y27Nkj2F46jhTWk7aLoiJ3fSsdYjSzq231ziKKX6PAEicPuRns EkSlR6Da1cvWA/e5PXrtca4nDn3EMhw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH5mlM7G8kU9oA0xss2TN/4HL4lmAHd98XE9qNHmYKz8IW9raiUGJTtbkyi28zAiyKVyHjs9l1ECFtVzD1XzO0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:40d2:b0:5cf:533:59c4 with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5cf0a306538mr15150181a12.7.1731437591059; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:53:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 19:52:00 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: stress-ng --lockmix 1 crashes with *** fatal error - NtCreateEvent(lock): 0xC0000035 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Takashi Yano X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Cedric Blancher via Cygwin Reply-To: Cedric Blancher Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Cygwin" On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 at 15:29, Sebastian Feld via Cygwin wrote: > > stress-ng --lockmix 1 crashes on CYGWIN_NT-10.0-19045 > 3.6.0-0.229.g87cd4f3fbd06.x86_64 > > $ stress-ng --lockmix 1 > stress-ng: info: [174] defaulting to a 1 day run per stressor > stress-ng: info: [174] dispatching hogs: 1 lockmix > stress-ng: info: [175] lockmix: exercising file lock types: flock locka lockf > 0 [main] stress-ng 175 C:\cygwin64\bin\stress-ng.exe: *** fatal > error - NtCreateEvent(lock): 0xC0000035 > stress-ng: warn: [174] metrics-check: > all bogo-op counters are zero, data may be incorrect > stress-ng: info: [174] skipped: 0 > stress-ng: info: [174] passed: 1: lockmix (1) > stress-ng: info: [174] failed: 0 > stress-ng: info: [174] metrics untrustworthy: 0 > stress-ng: info: [174] unsuccessful run completed in 1.28 sec > $ stress-ng: fail: [176] lockmix: fcntl F_SETLK failed, errno=14 (Bad address) > > Sebi OUCH I thought this was fixed with https://cygwin.com/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=commit;h=ae181b0ff1226cf38be8a7f03ff19bf869c87f54 @Takashi Did you try to run stress-ng --lockmix 1 with your patches applied? Ced -- Cedric Blancher [https://plus.google.com/u/0/+CedricBlancher/] Institute Pasteur -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple