DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 4A9BKssn3142024 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 4A9BKssn3142024 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=CIY+dRar X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8B6453858D26 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1731151253; bh=dO5AYgfDYm/3lfvM7yHYGCm8W0RYjGNOCS5qTfqozU4=; h=Subject:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=CIY+dRardb5ZFPolx9HUWQ+hbpKu+y9uoxnwt2CxfBEoxXRP2/0ek4zCYCNjPMkII jMb20R255BRlaQ9KIrrDUAI53q1bvyiZXo57msUWx7CIkZsyT2P0elvPvlS4tgbPUt 6udC8uR5ufRD5IjNJIjtE9g4CaQGFGUb3bfbFGEU= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 295203858D20 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 295203858D20 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1731151230; cv=none; b=Onm9M40umjQXxFEu7w3JYLleKmOmGSb4K1MqFsc1YjjxjKxX5IxpSkxzAn3cfODRTkaHvO9M3OWwWnEHVv0mOUd9HnB/YhKOZdZCjIE2jXOSiY2q0alI3+AKJQBE4lDfl9Rxb32pLXwU2jGVM4BQaBpk/D1AXoFO53dcidsjpSY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1731151230; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pM84xo1BwDLFexcvcFYjlDBppsOvbf/PGc48OvrF4SM=; h=DKIM-Signature:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date:Message-Id:To; b=WlAX6IvJwboKjITf8jJG3ammO4MMdvcXBPfwbjQuTvkRNLwEIxL4s92zhAGWww9xwlvsKivfrkQylKGa4Sbw3UhDFu3ifllijeTQK6WE6u/Oh6hRRYYLRLfiXLoYYWJIFSFRJuHEZrWVg+Cl0Y1OhlbHid3LgEO5dWVg5U0/AJA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1731151227; x=1731756027; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=pM84xo1BwDLFexcvcFYjlDBppsOvbf/PGc48OvrF4SM=; b=Z7m0wWu8KZAl9Agx2fv7tT5D7JRxGow4xXfZNkA8ngSZ9ckRRWCCUg+Z3uYKRQJhXm Zk/eppB8ZpdJLoBoh6K/onSGNBKgnLSMKzbv2jlYc/VDNYrng4XuCQISd8RW8NN5+7Kx yzBoTB01tLm/vBZLOb/5kYYKS330fCFBh7cWhK2EcishuHTp0WV+ML/l4vzezTC1wcRw 9gsaT2y2209Q1rn2n1oB67eutxomDxb4T/a29ecGSdGvaBIxM1U8NJpVpKISyLI5SPB9 Xz9m/5PyLEbQlTMI8b0ABdMgZgadZHwmD5fPeT3Nq0ZA41XTqswDKehhOW2/N8aNMsyr 6etQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yym9NbyIMBW3nQZ/094a5wG6rmUy2T+BW9WaloVaX0e3Qq4lpBC OsZJmOJX4HSdc26v/6hKKHRosr+o/YTIfkQZ+GPKZQI5UUKawgfNlFzRFjeZhWg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHr4Z4G77VLLPjJYAybrStdjREBp36shPGEUGVkQpR+k0usim2484LloVTI03GXqjpUphFJOA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:a03:b0:a99:facf:cfc with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a9eefeec7b7mr564002266b.17.1731151226573; Sat, 09 Nov 2024 03:20:26 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6.1.9\)) Subject: Re: Testing for 32bit or 64bit Cygwin in Makefile? In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2024 12:20:25 +0100 Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-Id: <4BF155F8-2CF8-43D0-8023-AA988F6F3FB0@unified-streaming.com> References: To: Sebastian Feld X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6.1.9) X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Dimitry Andric via Cygwin Reply-To: Dimitry Andric Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 4A9BKssn3142024 On 9 Nov 2024, at 11:42, Sebastian Feld via Cygwin wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 4:30 PM Dimitry Andric > wrote: >> >> On 6 Nov 2024, at 16:11, Sebastian Feld via Cygwin wrote: >>> >>> How can I test in a /usr/bin/make Makefile whether I am running on a >>> 32bit or 64bit Cygwin (not Windows kernel)? >> >> Usually in a shell you use "uname -m", or with bash specifically, the $HOSTTYPE variable. >> >> However in GNU make you should be able to use the internal variable $(MAKE_HOST). On my Cygwin installation, this gives the value "x86_64-pc-cygwin". Since I do not have any 32-bit Cygwin installation, I cannot tell you what the exact value is, but my guess would be "i386-pc-cygwin", or something like that. > > I need something which works with bsdmake (/usr/bin/bmake in Cygwin) > and GNU /usr/bin/make. Moreover, how would a test statement for this > look like in the Makefile? bmake doesn't have ifeq () BSD make has a different style for conditionals, using ".if", ".else", and so on. These use a more familiar logical operator syntax than GNU make. It also has a built-in variable MACHINE corresponding to "uname -m" output. So with bmake you can do: .if ${MACHINE} == "x86_64" .info Go here .else .info Go there .endif However, supporting both GNU make and BSD make in one Makefile is not really possible unless you use the lowest common denominator syntax, which is just variable assignments and basic rules. Otherwise, you would have to write two files, one called GNUmakefile for GNU make, and one called Makefile for BSD make. -Dimitry -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple