DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 49N5XQ5t3269704
Authentication-Results: delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=rgfa4I3c
X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 99F7A3858CDA
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1729661604;
	bh=QYbIKTvJGJ4t4ROq6SflMRiI1iyt7LtIep1+eKCwDyo=;
	h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	 List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	 From;
	b=rgfa4I3c5zqwWdZqz6r1Ntf7J+wXoUye8NR0nrtMJ3zttQC5EWgy+zcLzi0PPyKcG
	 XtSM4wWK1jf796sI3bQO937a6eidqkmLvWSINgKN5DJhCmHD8poAJu3an8tPnS8yWo
	 kHfUUk7jPJNxD8w0A4NT24gUsXdhoiiDs6fgFQZs=
X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 21EA63858D21
ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 21EA63858D21
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1729661584; cv=none;
 b=DxIZvB2IfOTRhCASL+Jy/mo14sXeI8CLaiI/4riYf1Qz5QjAzSRClX1orwNdm4calV9vj5Q7JLhS8ZI6gcrOwpVGkkbnW5hwX8/lmwX0Ph/RSnrXHgDKgvOXQ+U5+ExEOV3N2PW/2NHf3KoeghJ7SzuDKpVTKeAj7rn3p17XVzk=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
 t=1729661584; c=relaxed/simple;
 bh=gdLLJ/37RSkf0z10KuQUhXiKNHsGab92hd1GQsVuGg0=;
 h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From;
 b=gMC56RNrsCLXoniG92nBmzbx6sTs9IaCaqStWGiPvBKA9kuDbxSP4A6TvWbaHBjCjA0O8IILxCo59CcJVOPEbj++VC26w0hFeiL/ND3Qq53WUkHU1Wc/eQ5yYGgcDxbXLsiqQ+5/b06ML/NUFvrNZ1bJyKTFeG4MpWg6pxPiZ1Q=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org
Message-ID: <6fdbf92d-51f2-47ae-a482-5edd89ed3a89@maxrnd.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 22:33:08 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Is this correct behaviour for 'rev'?
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <CAKwdsS9FGm9nqtZ+vSQ+WEWzRf-zUFAS06eo=ASwNB6ST3gddw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <CAKwdsS9FGm9nqtZ+vSQ+WEWzRf-zUFAS06eo=ASwNB6ST3gddw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From: Mark Geisert via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: Mark Geisert <mark AT maxrnd DOT com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On 10/22/2024 8:00 PM, Backwoods BC via Cygwin wrote:
> It appears that 'rev' is choking on any character \x80 or higher, but
> is OK with those \x1f or smaller. It doesn't give an error or ignore
> it, it just stops.
> 
> I don't have access to a Linux box so I can't see if this happens
> there and nothing in the documentation suggests that this is the
> correct functionality.
> 
> Test case:
> printf 'no non-ASCII characters\nhex 01 >\x01< here\nhex 80 >\x80<
> here\nLine 4\n'|rev|rev
> 
> This is for "rev from util-linux 2.33.1"
> 
> I don't have the current version of 'rev' on my system due to not
> having updated in a while. I accidentally screwed up my installation
> and have been reluctant to wipe it and start over.
> 
> So, is this the expected behaviour for the current version of 'rev'
> under Cygwin and/or Linux?

The current Cygwin util-linux 2.39.3-2 rev behaves in the same, broken 
way.  It looks like line-ending char(s) are not being handled correctly. 
  Don't know yet if it's rev itself or fgetws() being used by rev that's 
busted.  I'll investigate further.  Thanks for the report!

..mark

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple