DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 46TE3TNx1777493 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=B7a2qI4h X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7804F3858410 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1722261807; bh=9nceQGD35l0CNNvhKKfCyHSnnmLGh51N7GLTpw+Zvhg=; h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=B7a2qI4hwF4F6ZVxxLVU/6Kd4SZg0EFaAfguM7RIE3EeYk+31phK1eY2xDlsQd+KB DgPT+H4/2WSCDH8O7U8qf1fnAg17EMRpn/q7//YC5wz5BbrK1fze1ZZYxGXiAYZeWE PL4OVFCdsNAhRNvUnl7FUYvk9RkBQktqElupvz1s= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org DAC9D3858D37 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org DAC9D3858D37 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1722261747; cv=none; b=CLwLLAAqUwep/LKTJWJgA/9fgBoACU5stUuMUDKYpd1F+9HVL5c+rlVB1DNxIGNQGz/VtEPYUzHxxhk6J7mi9suAk3m8Crn3jMfT4u8q0g7WPxlyHismiE8bIP0S+WfwWkB6nNl5SGDa9HlAE8iZOnP8wijeewapT5if6YbsOeM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1722261747; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KpplfPG4VCNSSILsu4OrnFCjnUhihS+qjVNQ6ZjxALY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Mime-Version:DKIM-Signature; b=psf2ATO9BwkXd3kY1rQgI1p4bIr0lGMo3dK/6oX4aiM/qlwAbda56bTr/P1tnnUSK1BOJKafm14D+WskrWPWbDke4z86pvde181SsbScSpQgHS/Qzv8923PSFDs5HWYn3PJRBoU7IVda9acwYHGV8BPtZhOb96diVMY+6yT19FU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 23:02:17 +0900 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Updated: gcc-12.4.0-3 Message-Id: <20240729230217.910629630577add9dd665eb1@nifty.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <8734ns4vya.fsf@Gerda.invalid> References: <8734ns4vya DOT fsf AT Gerda DOT invalid> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Takashi Yano via Cygwin Reply-To: Takashi Yano Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 07:18:53 +0200 ASSI wrote: > Additionally, a new option '-mno-align-vector-insn' has been implemented > (following the lead of MSys2 and using a patch by Kai Tietz) to enable > an easier (more targeted) workaround for the underlying stack data > alignment problem when passing vector datatypes by value (which is due > to a conflict with alignment requirements for SEH and remains unsolved > upstream). You can also use '-Wa,-muse-unaligned-vector-move', which is > more widely available. gcc of MSYS2 enables -mno-align-vector-insn flag by default. However gcc 12.4.0-3 does not enable this flag by default. Is this intentional? -- Takashi Yano -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple