X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4EC4B3858404 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1711291415; bh=ejBFxiHNtX2wcTEyLyCi1irTGYlR9FjrivD04Z85E3M=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=kl08fc/qlc813VC44wiFgoq+orblO2MadMWmAFsdpBAK+Zq4n/CChyHdsC/dagmdo FfDXdPoMRSOSMP9UEBkOMhmUeVBPXL20XuSkiEtXfWOJ0JKkQUl2dCtS11iQ2R1C8g GK4OMemIHgBqhhW2ycKG1zu1VWQCfqsdM8g/lab0= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 8D5D43858D33 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 8D5D43858D33 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1711291367; cv=none; b=vuiQJW7flRD57owj2XkBK2Zv9kp00YX1qqe+shPZxpm4LziOfwxMflFa+05SJu6OOT0h7HtCMaMhoSI2c5Ak+rGOwT2zJUEohjBfxccsmM0zb447onedYcSEerFFIgjuETGSIdOiXdx2Qn9oMwmCSZtE2QRwZ+i/F3ptIVgMiPI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1711291367; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Iwd45qo29keRe9e51TDJgfMgBW5spNwYmkyb/RxUlk4=; h=Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version; b=XWaS/zIl7k24pD5oIuLkVEjsTresympkIyqb4PiG1mVL2LP+yPQzU5ogdNtFdFB65jGt9HyIG4Z+nxJghtcgO40U9eIB62zIWuS+KYFgzff89GuX1+L/CvF5cX34h1+UdTGMajhmNjybMG6gwFcn8llLa06I+p/PKM7PXQ5cusE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Subject: Re: GetVersionEx() depreciated, what should be used instead for Windows 7/8/10? To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <0d8daf74-2861-8b08-b47c-28cf5d3b991f AT t-online DOT de> <538aa134-b079-12ec-76fe-5a60fc77c3ee AT t-online DOT de> <38b3f5df-ea63-8eb4-f0f9-4057c0eeae90 AT t-online DOT de> Message-ID: <3bff55cd-f8f2-24a7-8955-8765590a3caf@t-online.de> Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 15:42:36 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.53.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-TOI-EXPURGATEID: 150726::1711291358-2E7FBC95-EBB3E837/0/0 CLEAN NORMAL X-TOI-MSGID: beca80ec-ef24-4126-a74a-49c4dd0ef80e X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Christian Franke via Cygwin Reply-To: Christian Franke Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote: > On Mar 23 10:57, Christian Franke via Cygwin wrote: >> On Mar 21 16:15, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote: >>> On Mar 21 09:58, Christian Franke via Cygwin wrote: >>>>>> .. >>> I just gave it a try on W11. The results are even more funny than I >>> anticipated: >>> >>> ... >>> >>> So, yeah, with your observations especially on older W10 versions and >>> with 8.1 doing the same thing, I guess we can safely drop the extra call >>> to RtlGetNtVersionNumbers now. >> Or: >> Keep RtlGetVersionNumbers, compare result with RtlGetVersion and emit debug >> output if both differ. This would allow to diagnose a possible future >> reappearance of the issue. > Good idea! Do you want to create a patch? > I tried, but without success. Unfortunately debug_printf() does not work because wincap.init() is called before get_cygwin_startup_info() which calls strace.activate(). -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple