X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 389EB3858D39 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1711227910; bh=1lU7C2UDQ3rk8CTVTw2PEV5glsLOLLgkDIBjaWYZnAg=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=b/Dv0hRLfoLswwxnaNTS1/kvPlyP5uTrNwqGAkBdSv/AG9F7c1d4IlybIk0BNLt4Z 57CEk/IHb4gUabsLjOJrJ6Tj9QOjjgV08JW0dS2sJpD2xWmKXHPxZcWGRWVBcFJ300 6qZgYdFdFWDnFEwRzdWG1vmNNzveesSi7mFDUHzM= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 70BB13858D33 Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 22:04:49 +0100 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: GetVersionEx() depreciated, what should be used instead for Windows 7/8/10? Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <0d8daf74-2861-8b08-b47c-28cf5d3b991f AT t-online DOT de> <538aa134-b079-12ec-76fe-5a60fc77c3ee AT t-online DOT de> <38b3f5df-ea63-8eb4-f0f9-4057c0eeae90 AT t-online DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <38b3f5df-ea63-8eb4-f0f9-4057c0eeae90@t-online.de> X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: Corinna Vinschen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On Mar 23 10:57, Christian Franke via Cygwin wrote: > On Mar 21 16:15, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote: > > On Mar 21 09:58, Christian Franke via Cygwin wrote: > > > > > .. > > I just gave it a try on W11. The results are even more funny than I > > anticipated: > > > > ... > > > > So, yeah, with your observations especially on older W10 versions and > > with 8.1 doing the same thing, I guess we can safely drop the extra call > > to RtlGetNtVersionNumbers now. > > Or: > Keep RtlGetVersionNumbers, compare result with RtlGetVersion and emit debug > output if both differ. This would allow to diagnose a possible future > reappearance of the issue. Good idea! Do you want to create a patch? Thanks, Corinna -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple