X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 23F6F3858D34 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1708523137; bh=xnAB1Aie+Q6xpewfmvZ75Yj5GJjcSJbRppF7CVly9Ug=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=l/R6PnR37EFz5FY9fihnBlsdUsg/3Jsqklt9wxYYAfoxc/DNXar4bgzrsmLawQEak AmJexjUWgbBNIim/DcKCHd/SmB5rO90k99AXsTnQHEm4GnHtz8XRTsvaTK7+fD8jJk 7oHo9SzyPTycvC+0p9jxDkqB7S877yOHtMwp+xDY= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3E6563858D20 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 14:45:10 +0100 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: binutils >= 2.41 makes .rsrc section read-only Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: Corinna Vinschen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 41LDjc84023401 On Feb 21 09:27, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote: > On Feb 20 21:39, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Feb 2024, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > > On Feb 19 21:41, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin wrote: > > > > 1) is there actually a good reason that _cygheap_start is in the .rsrc and > > > > not the .cygheap section? > > > > > > As you know we got rid of this way to define the cygheap, but > > > _cygheap_start was just defined this way so it's the address marking > > > the start address of the cygheap. > > > > > > It was just the way it was. It's probably just as well to move > > > > > > _SYM (_cygheap_start) = .; > > > > > > to the begining of the .cygheap section. Did you try? > > > > I hadn't; I have now and it seems to work fine. > > I'm glad to read that. > > > I basically assumed there > > was some reason I wasn't aware of for putting it in the .rsrc section, so > > focused more on trying to figure out how to get binutils to clear the > > readonly section flag. When I couldn't figure that out, I figured I'd ask > > here both about the "institutional knowledge" if there was a known reason > > why it needed to be in the .rsrc section and because I figured some people > > knowledgable in binutils pe stuff might also read this and be able to give > > me another idea on making the .rsrc section read/write again if it did > > need to stay in that section. > > I think there was some historical reason to put in .rsrc, or rather, > into the section preceeding .cygheap, but I don't remember what it was. > Might have had something to do with stripping the cygwin DLL or some > such... Actually, searching the history shows commit ce95c6407ef6a from 2005-06-01, which moves the definition of __cygheap_start from the .cygheap section to the .idata section. However, the commit message only contains the hint "cygwin.sc: Modernize. [...]" There's no other reason given ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Corinna -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple