X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2D2893858C66 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1708494000; bh=IZyf1c+Xs/jOXnYUAiMRoSL2sPikDAZmuS1MGsVR288=; h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=Up8Kvf3Xl3rBUcP4FNbDCyWYfYpoRI3XhnspmpDX1/ag7u07tXNy16SKtwUDkRDxB vP94QOXOqU7Gcsc4FEkM/bTm9BrvD2Y81smTZpdJdbGMqkwZlvZ9HOXyMZ9rNhqKtH 3uYs33i8rUeW2pUtTsuVMUzfcUfzU4LovI2B55sY= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org CB2F03858D35 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org CB2F03858D35 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1708493974; cv=none; b=XPt9TYTsfXQwslbRKJGiUuci7kdaWH/K9/Hf0zHNEczEh0GIVmK6xZEKobfrIxFKCTOyTmKHVGDeR/Oao7FylZG1U+iIArrUFcLzWmcjjD8Lfx1POLLcf8xZw/LylKQc8ZN/ZutO58L6Kwoy9GnBBfQWkPnBTxyRSIWFXfW4kjs= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1708493974; c=relaxed/simple; bh=D3vuBNHcJSJTouTUYT+RZd14Ha6LkbjZJUIedxSYCxA=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=CViQaIi+U2xx+tYM862t/rI5fCGFQgAgNMXJ6OyC4kye78Jq7d/RHx7YtBpIVyljmpfiRN729BwpitlinAprtk0Kz5gjAcdD9bVIj2344lW7F6JtYQzKVdP5JiOBrruXPIAji2VWmeYSSc/Ba/eawWhd1xOZFv/WYzcGxfWChgk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 21:39:31 -0800 (PST) X-X-Sender: jeremyd AT resin DOT csoft DOT net To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: binutils >= 2.41 makes .rsrc section read-only In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (BSO 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Jeremy Drake via Cygwin Reply-To: Jeremy Drake Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On Tue, 20 Feb 2024, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Feb 19 21:41, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin wrote: > > 1) is there actually a good reason that _cygheap_start is in the .rsrc and > > not the .cygheap section? > > As you know we got rid of this way to define the cygheap, but > _cygheap_start was just defined this way so it's the address marking > the start address of the cygheap. > > It was just the way it was. It's probably just as well to move > > _SYM (_cygheap_start) = .; > > to the begining of the .cygheap section. Did you try? I hadn't; I have now and it seems to work fine. I basically assumed there was some reason I wasn't aware of for putting it in the .rsrc section, so focused more on trying to figure out how to get binutils to clear the readonly section flag. When I couldn't figure that out, I figured I'd ask here both about the "institutional knowledge" if there was a known reason why it needed to be in the .rsrc section and because I figured some people knowledgable in binutils pe stuff might also read this and be able to give me another idea on making the .rsrc section read/write again if it did need to stay in that section. -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple