X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 07DF13858C2F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1705927332;
	bh=OUdwGfp8PB6gffIZRopysQwThrsR1nzxWkocnCTaQR8=;
	h=To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	 List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	 From;
	b=CjAwzfGPXfmL1KcvwzV4vG3LaLQA1Q9BljiS9aBKW1BJLxmXsAtW5QbgDD5zTbO1+
	 JSbTQAud09XUdGY0ZOWcuHQjT+b0eW/ym/hljSc2C9Kgb20p1Kvl/WT2F9W0dsN44c
	 scN1t4+Y1hg8uPjrrJ/SstO1D/S+Hzv8FcZMNNUo=
X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 918183858D3C
ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 918183858D3C
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1705927310; cv=none;
 b=TUmcVn0JCLSJpnXl0Jw0lkfv5ey6R/VL8JrObqWNW9oRfvZne+FUtbMPhx3aUthEt6omu/sZyL30ZW1iCNIgwu+z02HBLAOJV+ka7mlkOsUlq8VQ2Dq3B4mqrXoghKtk8Yr20jdu++3CJBB2PUon1or8vIPWzttVwabI2N2NRoY=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
 t=1705927310; c=relaxed/simple;
 bh=yQmoW0WwWZERT9H8t9jOE+3HgBoZm12xEEpq71lWDxI=;
 h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version;
 b=lYUzQW3neJnGQvMcBhwgj9dnnHStQFlYLS2oy4h3pXbDn1om3w3WbJwmMNWwnLsSP6zt0nMoAsy6rCcMn0+StyUzcM/bK8H+41e3n8o/ocPVeF97d40ayd5wlPIvdt01uqykPeQPCVKFr8AlyS4GpHOsrQdVwB3ET+3MSIzEfPw=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Possiblly bug of cygwin1.dll
In-Reply-To: <Za5WY_MGIqEk9qS3@calimero.vinschen.de> (Corinna Vinschen via
 Cygwin's message of "Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:49:55 +0100")
References: <20240120131825 DOT 4157c259fe058155137d6fe0 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
 <20240120141349 DOT cde31e62177a0405b0ee9934 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
 <87v87ov03x DOT fsf AT Gerda DOT invalid>
 <20240120212427 DOT 1e69fd3655ece73ecd508def AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
 <20240121201051 DOT 795a4405576a97ab8729e273 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
 <20240122123023 DOT b8eaac0e50d1e8856f44a115 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
 <Za40iEPcedfBSt5n AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
 <Za48HKcCwgYSLQdY AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
 <20240122201602 DOT 0a172f5965821f6e8d6afb96 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
 <Za5WY_MGIqEk9qS3 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 13:41:36 +0100
Message-ID: <877ck1ilq7.fsf@>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate-size: 672
X-purgate-ID: 155817::1705927303-F17F942C-A33A6F82/0/0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3030.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, INVALID_MSGID, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From: ASSI via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: ASSI <Stromeko AT nexgo DOT de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin writes:
> However, I don't find this in the standards.  pthread_once is neither
> one of the required cancellation points, nor one of the optional
> cancellation points.

The initializer can be cancellable per POSIX, though:

"The pthread_once() function is not a cancellation point. However, if
init_routine is a cancellation point and is canceled, the effect on
once_control shall be as if pthread_once() was never called."


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

SD adaptations for Waldorf Q V3.00R3 and Q+ V3.54R2:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple