X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 06A853857C5E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1701396322; bh=9vliVrnebEJmOSyvHAxIO3E8qMmIrfYih0hJp8H2xoE=; h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=Zo5jOTx10Ns2Y6tBf4V9kiCYJu5eVeyOTqS7ttsoAoUuWMw3MIZN9mjCHht+Wwuxx /fHJLiEVgQFzIcIZ742sDYs9+zJDqnNozxGiZT9omka+B1clhKmPoXN/QyC6mWMv29 0tN6TcC8k0V0ImiYa6f3wWk/gAWPGq7qr/iRBrIc= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 58ED6385829F ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 58ED6385829F ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701396306; cv=none; b=rokeffwKipRyRDiH5/U6etpv4unn+tIY8tsweCsWPppX3YX92X/BJhtQCxNALo0CKz5Nzve1nSzxoc4cphd1mJNhaKhGx4Cxg0f8rQ1X2uANRmw8c36jBv7+owD81plgXnqlHriNBB3TiQ/wqk39WZ+DlwJ9qNwpGCauPVS0MS4= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701396306; c=relaxed/simple; bh=A40Mq2FCi3xMRMbe5kRhNn/bbutQBOjPdEYJgMx+Pbs=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:Message-ID:To:Subject:MIME-Version; b=OlhcGMG6BrWp4aSe1Ar93+nh7GAC36+kbWXCsqI0A0FTQWVEU4lpHeC4lgYM7cKVKHwSI4C5NY4PL1ECB+i7xclbN1VepIpk5jpV7uSL1eR2syPwwC59xQzKNRWv3HsdSwXAHO8z4q6fJvyHCewlcY7sNG76Nh8N4SelZgQ18lw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org X-Yandex-Fwd: 1 Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 04:55:28 +0300 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v9.3.4) Professional Message-ID: <1463776016.20231201045528@yandex.ru> To: Martin Wege , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cygwin mount limited to 64 mounts, even for UNC paths? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_THEBAT, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Andrey Repin via Cygwin Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: Andrey Repin Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" Greetings, Martin Wege! > Cygwin mount(1) is (per docs) limited to 64 mounts. Why was that > limitation chosen, and does it apply even if I create bind mounts to > UNC paths (not DOS letters)? DOS letters might be restricted by the > ASCII A-Z, but UNC paths are unlimited. More interesting question is: why do you need so many _Cygwin_ mounts? There's a lot of other options, from NTFS junctions to using UNC paths directly (Cygwin tools aren't picky in this regard). -- With best regards, Andrey Repin Friday, December 1, 2023 04:53:35 Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple