X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6409B3858CDA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1697876730; bh=LEeU2ux+smXrKsSVXBL12mX7l6zTwFu7r3QOCgjXHXg=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=uh1uq7oF92e/RHL2UKGy/o8VLBGBqgBA9dLeziQ1JlxbMb5/pYvAxUPsDCXwXmiI8 xuFqQlzIEhGuZGP2L5hQs3d1WDRXSk5eYRXOOp1OBP1jY9q9vO4qM7dyaupZm5UxCL ZGjB4rb4DB212BgUsDq0RUaE+KqODTv3ob/lEEGo= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 2151D3858D35 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 2151D3858D35 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1697876709; cv=none; b=g0iaqxcbp7H+6ZFbDB/GfELyeEvgWA/Y+QqXW4e/2Xquw0uVmQqoH6P+oeJU9jg48bXPGEIVjKDQi5kemUWoEitq4b3xSmfzI9yNKxRr1RqeiqDBatud1xNlQBZ0GD3WiIlui9yDed+fiWcXqsbB3urHfvW0cZK+PgaANCZStvk= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1697876709; c=relaxed/simple; bh=G8Q0vV4C60HVXk41b1DqOTTOLeXtsE/pQsNPvLCyPnQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=Vq9CjUgFMcLMB/XrH6lGKcjGdP0qCDvnonuNsIriRTaMRyzaNDPrQSXPpf5aAgwDUX+N6ok4zNuZ9aSY2n67rg15U4tEQ9m4dIRaUUurxEoW6OD0kQtIO72d23SopEM29hqa+DGB11Tyc2bprtxl/RHcX/ChPI93bmKQLVbljUc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at smtp01.aussiebb.com.au X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Message-ID: <56c54a91-7f9a-4eec-a1e4-1bf4429ebec4@shaddybaddah.name> Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2023 19:24:40 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Cygwin/X - *bizarre discovery* doorknock like behaviour for new windows Content-Language: en-GB To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <3ee1ac1f-e828-4407-9826-74d3e70e77ad AT shaddybaddah DOT name> In-Reply-To: <3ee1ac1f-e828-4407-9826-74d3e70e77ad@shaddybaddah.name> X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Shaddy Baddah via Cygwin Reply-To: Shaddy Baddah Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "Cygwin" Hi, On 20/10/2023 12:40 pm, Shaddy Baddah via Cygwin wrote: > > > On 20/10/2023 11:50 am, Shaddy Baddah via Cygwin wrote: >> What I am seeing is that for Cygwin/X, in multi-window mode (and it >> just occurred to me it would be helpful to check the behaviour in >> rooted(? manual page terminology) mode. I'll follow-up on this)... >> in multi-window mode (Xwin -multiwindow), when I try to open an X window >> for any given app, it is not displayed on the first run. > > For completeness, rooted mode does not have this issue. > > Also, a further note, once reproduced, further reproductions may require > exiting XWin, and restarting it. I've found a bizarre, and to me, a hilarious, reason for this behaviour. So my assertion that it happens once per app is wrong. It happens only on the very first run of an X11 app on a newly started Xwin server. I guess I noticed this when I ran different X11 apps as the first run app against the Xwin server, and drew that longbow. Apologies for any confusion. But it still happens that very first time. *And* the app is actually displayed. Bizarely though, it is trapped within the confines of the ConEmu (https://conemu.github.io/) command session Xwin was started under. So if that ConEmu session is not at the front of the visible stack, you have no idea the app has been displayed/rendered. I haven't looked, but I speculate ConEmu, which is feature rich, has some feature that makes it act as a "rooted" X window? It feels like a reach though... the other theory is that something with it's DLL injection perhaps. I'll look at that separate from Cygwin/X though. I have tried using regular Windows command prompt, and this doesn't happen. Nor with the Windows (Metro) Terminal app. Again, sorry for any confusion this has caused. -- Regards, Shaddy -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple