X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 583FD3858408
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1694214210;
	bh=2jbxLJViz64J5GT6MNXTLTLtqclYe7IO1fDULVeQ1ww=;
	h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	 List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	 From;
	b=ry3SCGQhy4D2EAEArOhA9r2AoOKswsT29x7kH77p0lSjQ/CXMAJS1E9lJgm+VewDj
	 HdaTE5lhtWstqgOZrno59Vo37lFGR/smE7Nonk61QRa+VLM95zZQwNIJ4/MUR805zK
	 8gNC4d7bfIHv9sby8ZgZiKNBvuLA7NZoSS+sK/DU=
X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org AF57E3858D1E
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694214171; x=1694818971;
 h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=5iORfjVENMNyKoIZn6FUjxqlAcKytAEMMbduIZJA3u4=;
 b=Wx1VnzB86BSmAH7JIP9IKMkWtCXiI+6J8zY9iJJ3HKGIYgQnpHi7IZCeVltSbE/8dP
 qxbuzhfjkvIA3qscCnVOUV/ZzOTgOFlaKWGA7fPoQksNOdKO6ONrK3TnlH7OzgRXqAWS
 FsyNGVeO3VqPAh71g1AbdqpB6X89i+eiBm3Ogudcl6g5YnYRuEzP+jPe/VQmsjMj3cf7
 XxsXFYEUptnC8rXW3ARKCFguvc+WxK25V32p0rpq/yQGQFHhpUcqOkx8MazV1KkeLwXO
 i9unyamFU1WkrTIUtLV8ETC/7/rDLFMF2qztbLYbjiZf1WCUhDNWoilnoKnDZVTnHKPN
 yU9w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzdbAJCkqiK18yn2Rpge3uDL825f1lAGZYqzKoB0aQfw/u5tzpI
 vFyxv+NBOL5BBuKx/zJAUhn7ae6/ha5oJgybufUhsR6d
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGRe2V+aIFG37VMseURr14yUDHmms6rxPso6RY5zZ5G6aLaU6xYxpUc0pQ72EQQkz4lxtdDdJbEB2cxB4/Qius=
X-Received: by 2002:a0d:e24c:0:b0:589:fb7b:4932 with SMTP id
 l73-20020a0de24c000000b00589fb7b4932mr3869636ywe.42.1694214170883; Fri, 08
 Sep 2023 16:02:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CANnL4pMrcdfZheDO7_-sR92CtGH5jJVuw=sAJeAtummjhFGqKQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <ZPr8KB/MpdMOe2IL AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
 <CANnL4pMk-Y_0hS+z_VzK_Egf4hk2seztJA_b=24iYxf0t=jj2Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <ZPsJKZjc1woHSZFu AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To: <ZPsJKZjc1woHSZFu@calimero.vinschen.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 19:02:39 -0400
Message-ID: <CANnL4pM5pM=DCNWa4LKCfSe-wtm_b0DDfuy-wki98dS6j2xcDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ARG_MAX missing from getconf
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Matthew mirage335 Hines <spamfreemirage335 AT gmail DOT com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,
 FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.30
X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From: "Matthew \"mirage335\" Hines via Cygwin" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: "Matthew \"mirage335\" Hines" <spamfreemirage335 AT gmail DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 388N3VBe014075

Ok, excellent, thank you, good to know.

On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 7:44 AM Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
wrote:

> On Sep  8 07:36, Matthew "mirage335" Hines via Cygwin wrote:
> > Ok, I guess that makes sense.
> >
> > My worry was some './configure' script determining that the build
> > environment is somehow not 'sane'. At least for the limited set of
> programs
> > that I use under cygwin, I have set up my CI to now watch for changes in
> > which binaries are present. Nothing obviously significant in that history
> > so far.
> >
> > At this point, from comparing with my previous CI results, I am guessing
> > this doesn't affect me, aside from adding an exception to my test case
> for
> > this specifically. Might be better to get closer to the usual Linux
> > behavior I am familiar with, of a much higher, valid, ARG_MAX value.
>
> We just don't have a maximum except an out of resources situation.  A
> standard-conformant application must deal with any sysconf variable
> denoting a limit to return -1, i. e., "no limit".
>
> Corinna
>

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple