X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 460AD3858408 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1694173497; bh=AEZ6EfOywhzDwwLHiJFgXhPoFVV1JlI2bFo7bxW3XSI=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=PChKAkXegsY1cfCK8UDs+Jca2Dl4Z3OlQ2be/3Bq0HCW6pVsKeEn67s8jM1bLse5+ F6SDAqsl3j068UDmz1pQFFfiLAOvW6XG5GPT/p3sdCUivCeCLC0un6jBR+tw9JHtrA 6cnx3mML2951xGpqSBtOD8ybe1s5sVzLLzvErBFw= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 189413858D1E Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:44:41 +0200 To: Matthew mirage335 Hines Subject: Re: ARG_MAX missing from getconf Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Matthew mirage335 Hines , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: Corinna Vinschen , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On Sep 8 07:36, Matthew "mirage335" Hines via Cygwin wrote: > Ok, I guess that makes sense. > > My worry was some './configure' script determining that the build > environment is somehow not 'sane'. At least for the limited set of programs > that I use under cygwin, I have set up my CI to now watch for changes in > which binaries are present. Nothing obviously significant in that history > so far. > > At this point, from comparing with my previous CI results, I am guessing > this doesn't affect me, aside from adding an exception to my test case for > this specifically. Might be better to get closer to the usual Linux > behavior I am familiar with, of a much higher, valid, ARG_MAX value. We just don't have a maximum except an out of resources situation. A standard-conformant application must deal with any sysconf variable denoting a limit to return -1, i. e., "no limit". Corinna -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple