X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DED303858431 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1692966236; bh=vYUlxCu4NNempHvgY1VYy9CVqU66JTreLJCGDDFwfbU=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=vMLv5LKnDQHL2EmaYaZs+JmBlJ/aMvBl2RRV0uaO/rrsSVDGA+6H7nF3GhojTuAok TWV1HybsPCgzGOPyNdf8x8ucggV1z90fszM1axYnQz/BC1tRpBbUgLAhCWZfzAZK8l Vj4LK8EFepcdUkT6FX0muhRBPeEwBZDEq0guyE3M= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F1F4C3858C53 Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 14:23:16 +0200 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: scp stalls on uploading in cygwin 3.5 current master. Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20230824060502 DOT c4798062cb19d4d35a5633ae AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> <20230824123131 DOT 390b4471915c963425c77608 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> <20230825174832 DOT 9ebae8112667d5d5411cb8db AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: Corinna Vinschen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On Aug 25 12:08, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via Cygwin wrote: > > I don't have an answer to this problem yet. > > > > Can we use send(sock, "", 0) to reenable FD_WRITE, perhaps? > > Can't it just be assumed that the socket is _always_ writeable _unless_ the last send() failed? > In other words, try to always send() if it did not fail before. If it did, only send() after > FD_WRITE was returned in the event mask. You're looking from the application perspective, but as the underlying library we don't have the application under control. The application can rightfully expect POSIX-like behaviour from select(2), and *that* means, it can expect select(2) to return a socket as non-writable if the internal buffer is full, *before* it calls send: while (...) { /* send as long as we can, otherwise do another job in the meantime */ while (select (..., )) send (); } Corinna -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple