X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0985D3858020
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1691405032;
	bh=jERtszklsUKS1Ra3HFJhuqNZqw/zOG717wJCwcCrO+o=;
	h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	 List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	 From;
	b=guOEf+U20FUdq9ewAfesB+CpCplqEHbwcQVViLXSEIpUZgbivbE9G4Ns3HOOB85XP
	 rlJeQd27/qENNIEbMeiykKS6eyFND1JV2PielPMdxRFiDuST9DE55Lg/3W4nl7WEe7
	 Oz14T6sxUmw7FUcRsj/kgMKdUwEStzEKUN5x3dZM=
X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 126C63858D28
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691404994; x=1692009794;
 h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=PQgP7r/B0PFoxdBdaT7zxVWLAGOlaHejE+lSws3kZN8=;
 b=FT7WaRO7yeGwbmEv2uLdUCAVGQaqkEf8i7EpIBhf6aw+Rz+cAivyLwFeEwmnTjq6py
 1LkGDprYwynYEfcNZItPQ2J55INVmr1R3UbI09CbeVkOhKJasSTB0g5KPW4bg5r+FuPK
 nrXQqbZTAbNSDNCfi5/dYmS+qk9hBt+0Q2Gdf/b6e22HQMDqu5MX3LGLVrXgXLgYAuq5
 HmvX7NeKodvPUp6OrwUBgVqsHE6W+Ajh9RQvfkzs1A/UPwp41fSTVfxPphW+AVUKkEhf
 u84PAHN4Vu5L/zVMNg9hYY8ohf66CjiOQJFktXFZ+vZl8DVLIlpadNF22OLn56b88SZD
 H4og==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwG4Ims36ICK3Q4fbPDFQ3buzw2uEXquZK6rz3QbzsMNjvwgS7/
 LXWkFojtYQpgiNLzzsT5B9s9DZr3Z2uo5cvO2yOAxnzwMWsuHAm51Ro=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFMsGdqQlBc9q1SoGUuhkCAVzfX07xEA6GU7XI5nLveMiHNVNLpYB1zqfrr/TClqS72r4bppEyfUK/k+AbwmxU=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:5005:0:b0:4fe:19ef:8795 with SMTP id
 e5-20020a195005000000b004fe19ef8795mr5649353lfb.64.1691404993923; Mon, 07 Aug
 2023 03:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALXu0UfBK0+tYO_-3rgvZhpmKh8z4aVqMJMZ2=LfFmuJ1Vsmzw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <CALXu0UewB26V01xbNTyTRPxCwtW_iyTD-_92_9WzrJLtwX6FwA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <ZNC/jK1A7iolJku4 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To: <ZNC/jK1A7iolJku4@calimero.vinschen.de>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 12:43:01 +0200
Message-ID: <CALXu0UfsYo=CMpApdVWF5S3Vw5pwMbB70o0UJ9tdHDE05gHGOw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel stack trace for Winows 10 blue screen when running Cygwin?
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From: Cedric Blancher via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: Cedric Blancher <cedric DOT blancher AT gmail DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Mon, 7 Aug 2023 at 11:55, Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
>
> On Aug  7 11:29, Cedric Blancher via Cygwin wrote:
> > Forwarding to cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> >
> > Honestly I find it deeply concerning that a plain, unprivileged user
> > can Bluescreen a machine, and more so that it happens during normal
> > Cygwin usage.
>
> Same here.  Cygwin is userspace only!
>
> If any call in Cygwin can generate a bluescreen, it's a bug in the
> kernel or in the driver.  Naturally, we have neither control over the
> kernel, nor over the NTFS driver.  You might want to open a support case
> with Microsoft.

Well, a colleague is handling that. The feedback sent to her however was that:
- Cygwin is not a Windows product
- We should WSL instead
- Cygwin might make use private Windows apis
- We should run this by the "Cygwin company"

It is my turn now to provide a kernel stack trace to prove them wrong
- IF I can manage to make one. That's why I am asking for help here.

HELP!

Ced

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple