X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AC4673858414 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1690827641; bh=CAcJAC9QP7vA2kgosAoDy3Hv5o54ofgI/BOxmsn0DaU=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=usf0nzCOI8TjsuToAsg82rSa3isX5T9Zdb2z4GKnUyLZiNwOkz2pi+09ya3dLGo0b T/RWLMLfuwnvu7dEnKCjliosMMVpI0BXxc0G+VSk8Rw5Iynus/DcF2ChV+EagJjt8I YOEQ14HuFJxto/iVvL0Dj3SYiIC+JY9pK2FL5qOY= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F07103858C53 Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 20:20:26 +0200 To: Bruno Haible Subject: Re: character class "alpha" Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Bruno Haible , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <3884636 DOT 3uDm00564X AT nimes> <5176597 DOT IBPj4gxFZX AT nimes> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: Corinna Vinschen , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On Jul 31 19:46, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote: > On Jul 31 16:06, Bruno Haible via Cygwin wrote: > > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > I have a problem with the c32isalpha function. > > > > > > c32isalpha fails for the character U+FF11 FULLWIDTH DIGIT ONE, > > > because it expects the character to be an alphabetic character. > > > > This is not a big problem. You can see in the test-c32isalpha.c file > > that this test is disabled for many platforms, in particular glibc. > > Which is interesting, because I actually tried that today on glibc, and > for iswalpha (0xff11) it returns 1. So it actually behaves as the > testcase expects. > > > There's no problem with disabling it on Cygwin as well. > > I'd rather make Cygwin do the same as glibc. Hmm, there are more of those expressions which are disabled on glibc and fail on Cygwin, for instance in test-c32iscntrl.c. Maybe it's actually the better idea to disable them on Cygwin, too, rather than to change a working system... Corinna -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple