X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D908D385841C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1690717076;
	bh=0UkECV/xHs4VC/MDCvlJRaheaeiFbnqMzg4xMv5xAmA=;
	h=Date:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:
	 List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:
	 From:Reply-To:From;
	b=CtiooWwzny0mQ8oC7KWit+M1/t6C8JkmzgVVGiSQaPQe2YUzfDULNHv4FOLhp+sk5
	 l2JY7f3q7c5KoaXysfItlBYZhBaPe6NQ0NaqMP0WFnjgA1AWEYBJu1IyO8y7RMvjHU
	 JGSvnfKmYMUcDL9BkFXsSZ4lEkzsfCTAit9/bPZw=
X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org CBFD63858D35
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2023 20:37:35 +0900
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc: moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu
Subject: Re: Probable bug
Message-Id: <20230730203735.7d94749b4f08a9de9cc3ca9f@nifty.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To: <bf5f14f8-8dfd-13da-87b5-a0117fd04b05@cs.umass.edu>
References: <199362107 DOT 5561484 DOT 1690709920649 AT mail1 DOT libero DOT it>
 <bf5f14f8-8dfd-13da-87b5-a0117fd04b05 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
 NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From: Takashi Yano via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Sun, 30 Jul 2023 07:29:10 -0400
Eliot Moss wrote:
> On 7/30/2023 5:38 AM, natan_b--- via Cygwin wrote:
> > Hi Guys
> > 
> > very short.
> > 
> > prog.c
> > 
> > #include <stdio.h>
> >   
> > int main()
> > {
> > float a=1.283;
> > while(1)
> > printf( "%f", a );
> > }
> >   
> > run with
> > $ ./prog.exe >/dev/null
> >   
> > in windows monitor process the process increase it's memory it arrive to many  Gb.
> > It's not a machine problem, other PC have same problem.
> >   
> > Same program in wsl and MSYS2 works well!
> 
> This probably has to do with output buffering, and may happen even without
> the >/dev/null since there are no line ends in the output.  It may work with
> stdbuf -o0 (as in: stdbuf -o0 ./prog.exe >/dev/null) but may cause the program
> to run more slowly (each character is sent to the device, when then immediately
> discards it).  It would seem you're hoping for the internal libraries to
> recognize the case of writing to /dev/null ...

I also suspected that, however, it was not correct.

while (1) sprintf(buf, "%f\n", a);

has the same problem. :-(

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple