X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 610F13857720 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1681985976; bh=lmXap0tqcj0TglOLDJfh+3Ff1e9OnEQHmWIsjIXQIMM=; h=To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=cGlYOZQ8eDPNoE3ve9TnAZoH79+B0WdkL1dvrfRFTXdu9JmH5WuMBWLIaIodUW/Vc Vj20qoPBs0hIvTo5rBebkY3OtGZJXy849qRFk8IqB0i7Yxt9edfd+vgC6U2u2mHhUr RP7z4siVQT4pWFuoP2bH41c71oIieYANfl6JpW+s= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org A46F73858D37 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1681985940; cv=none; d=strato.com; s=strato-dkim-0002; b=ry9mp7PVqyXXct59WsMGybWkrDAg5/6Y4WOXpuGAk4NKzRe6G/Lsor88P8lDIj/93G Vlehc8iSCV9g7JbVrAgPnusDjS9mx9C+dxmCBbyQOgeTbZt5IC9Hz+OVB1u5xtS+kkOx nivj00lawtdNjrpRe81bFWZ/g+/tEFESTcQbntINdjZWA5LOGwWNapSU4Wk117S+Dqfl WD0Qye3IDqPr1LNrSUw5qdTib0ldeqhOjMTuSgY6Y/KDCj2rLquNVRBkmv4NaNaq1X+3 V315cdZPVvcvKpQphrAetdKE5x/V+XMPeqiAnawiVVSKcIjBrIIN6qfxBbthaqJGcXCC /UhQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1681985940; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=strato.com; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=R2PtNyFR2x3h+LDaFSji3Lt5AineOx8yhJS6Eq56p88=; b=sQIfKNeS66axmYWwjcVlyv8pQtqnlpt1YSg6kuBXRYfV9TPtQ0M1fj5/FjSE3+9iNS RsenPLd663SK1kk5xWHTiJK8iDYi5qVjd+r2B9eE0LW8d4uOZpk2E/TPm8h3KphhghOQ vdTwwYHXMNBRyKlOVOenbh/r7VI1+OJqfL5S/AWYhbt9PZ5uc90fXlLnQLKfFty9La1u e1imwNPqJur7gSsIDH0v7Hq5IiPOGjRVc5biYbUfHVOSH8RyC9bzBbYgiulSU3X0dkPX T+igEg4NggnHBTjvIzb8Iz8O1NO6JhiKIKaGsWTlFdmoa9esgUACbgafYUcYATD89wcr U2Tg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; strato.com; arc=none; dkim=none X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 X-RZG-AUTH: ":Ln4Re0+Ic/6oZXR1YgKryK8brlshOcZlIWs+iCP5vnk6shH0WWb0LN8XZoH94zq68+3cfpPDj/1vgIuvkaOwJLsXaUZx50Vobw==" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: gs-cygwin DOT com AT gluelogic DOT com Subject: Re: posix_spawn facility Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 12:18:59 +0200 Message-ID: <1853259.CQOukoFCf9@nimes> In-Reply-To: References: <1752276 DOT 7aRn1RRit1 AT nimes> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Bruno Haible via Cygwin Reply-To: Bruno Haible Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Unfortunately you can't expect any noticable difference on Cygwin by > using posix_spawn. While Cygwin has a spawn() family of functions, we > don't (and can't... yet) use them. > > The problem is that we don't have a safe way to perform the spawn > attributes and file actions which are supposed to be performed between > the fork() and the exec() step when using the spawn() functions. This > would have to be implemented first. So, you are saying that on Cygwin, spawnvpe() and friends are fast, because child_info_spawn::worker ends up calling CreateProcessW rather immediately? But posix_spawn is slow, because it goes another path, through fork()? If that's the case, it might help to look at how I created Gnulib's posix_spawn for native Windows: 1) Extend the spawnvpe function to a spawnvpech function. It takes additional arguments - const char *currdir - int currdirfd - HANDLE stdin_handle, HANDLE stdout_handle, HANDLE stderr_handle (The latter is because the first 3 file descriptors are passed specially on Windows.) 2) Refactor the guts of spawnvpech, moving as much as possible into helper functions. In my case, spawnvpech shrunk to only 150 lines of code. The helper functions, in the native Windows case, were: - prepare_spawn - compose_command - compose_envblock - init_inheritable_handles, compose_handles_block, free_inheritable_handles - convert_CreateProcess_error See https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=blob;f=lib/windows-spawn.h . I would expect that similar helper functions can be created in Cygwin. The "inheritable handles" is a data structure that allows for the arbitrary reshuffling of file descriptors required by posix_spawn (the addopen, adddup2, addclose actions), i.e. which does the book- keeping which HANDLE must in the end be open in the parent and which must in the end be open in the child, and at which position. While at the same time optimizing the number of DuplicateHandle calls. Without this optimization, the code is simpler, but there were many redundant DuplicateHandle calls. This data structure is essential for posix_spawn[p] to be multithread- safe. posix_spawn[p] must not modify the file descriptors of the parent; instead it has to create the planned file descriptors for the child in memory. During this refactoring, it is essential to have a good test suite. Because when you make a mistake and leave a fd / HANDLE accidentally open (in the parent or in the child), applications that invoke a pipe start to hang. 3) With these helper functions, write a new core for posix_spawn[p]. In my case, it was less than 250 lines of code, which is not straightforward, but also not really hard either. See https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=blob;f=lib/spawni.c lines 610..852. At this step, you can use Gnulib's test suite for verifying that the new code works properly. Hope this helps. Bruno -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple