X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D7FC93857700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1681501398; bh=ebQejkTdy9wWs5xXkslFoerY1OAoml8RxrWleiICdZ4=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=AylDips+9bspWk2fWa3tsGLdPffRegFMC4QZO7Y6NK55a/jEL7wceysoxroK4McKu 08fWLrdgxj2IxT3wYoThmYpiw5fsG1POXcMoI4RUGctv/0qpFxsO+8u+b6KOwNagBN 95LJt+NOvH3uwr55uSbWzz7IOXap3ZqLHzyrj6Z4= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org E6EEA3858C54 Message-ID: <87c859fc-0bfb-e6cc-a29e-29ba4eaa1820@cs.umass.edu> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 15:43:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 Subject: Re: Permissions question / issue Content-Language: en-US To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <88697a53-26db-6969-2c18-3d6133d248c1 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eliot Moss via Cygwin Reply-To: moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "Cygwin" On 4/14/2023 3:11 PM, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote: > On Apr 13 23:03, Eliot Moss via Cygwin wrote: >> Dear cygwin'ers - >> >> I seem to be caught in a bind with the Cygwin permissions setup. >> >> ssh insists that ~/.ssh/config have permissions no less permissive than rw------- (600). > > Huh? No, it doesn't, usually. My file has perms rw-r--r-- (644) and > that's perfectly fine. Also, I tried the same setting as you did, > i. e. > > $ getfacl config > # file: config > # owner: corinna > # group: vinschen > user::rw- > group::--- > group:SYSTEM:r-x > mask::r-x > other::--- > > And ssh still works as desired and does not throw any error. > > You can also add g:SYSTEM:r-x to the directories and it should have > no negative side effect. I just did that with ~/.ssh and ssh still > works as expected. Of course you're entirely right, Corinna! Not sure how I got it in my head that it needed 600 permissions. Thank you for clarifying! However ... ssh *does* demand that key files be accessible only by the user. Is there a solution - if necessary using Windows tools - to make ssh happy while allowing a SYSTEM backup tool to back up the file? Regards - Eliot -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple