X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 600953858417 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1681478753; bh=WKVi4I6mfIxmZe7qW+v7ItPn258OmO67OQ4MvO5lmOs=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=fZU7QFzHgCXCHVwWsutewiJHfJvL60V9XD30F8IfdPJj3IsFiAY6euPWWOFnVJH7U uLBbIguYENg33GZgbjXVTKpv9HjeOvDQtyRIiGZ+MyA7bLTcJ8JJ/0SUdh0z1aw/Xv FWqhterFbQTiIvi+A1psHP0uE40DMLEwyWthtIVo= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 80ADB3858C39 Message-ID: <64e30724-245f-a94f-2bad-0f001a56d582@cs.umass.edu> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 09:25:13 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 Subject: Re: Permissions question / issue To: cygwin References: <88697a53-26db-6969-2c18-3d6133d248c1 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <88697a53-26db-6969-2c18-3d6133d248c1@cs.umass.edu> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eliot Moss via Cygwin Reply-To: moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 33EDQFC1001656 On 4/13/2023 11:03 PM, Eliot Moss via Cygwin wrote: > Dear cygwin'ers - > > I seem to be caught in a bind with the Cygwin permissions setup. > > ssh insists that ~/.ssh/config have permissions no less permissive than rw------- (600). ---> should have read no *more* permissive (sent too late at night!) > However, my backup program runs as SYSTEM and needs access.  I tried to > provide that access by adding an ACL g:SYSTEM:r-x, but that appears as > rw-r-x--- and ssh doesn't like it. > > I seem to recall that at some point in the past we agreed to ignore the > permissions given to SYSTEM when computing effective permission (e.g., as > output by ls -l).  That would suit the purpose. > > Did something change?  or am I misremembering the solution to the conundrum? > > Note: I have Administrator privilege on my machine, but that doesn't help, > since the backup tool runs under SYSTEM, a different account. > > Best wishes - Eliot Moss > -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple