X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 902E93858CDA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1680943840; bh=fB/Ci9IJBPQu/Vj1WHO9UR2F8y/qfiPnWMEGai1sfPY=; h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=mgd4wCMOJC7GvjReHAEtnxzcaS4ccgrxeuMBwJLIj3KrwC8i4osTunJ0NIO2UA1X0 jLevMr2UgGL5Rba57Ju6PQ0l9IMWMGuJLzFqlcaYDOx2s6DwsKAfc4d33Pg+27lMQq /H7iPYZrV6F5qrD2rU/wuESt61+hVxDbuR9jMYSI= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org ED1843858D1E X-Yandex-Fwd: 1 Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2023 11:37:17 +0300 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v9.3.4) Professional Message-ID: <829298512.20230408113717@yandex.ru> To: Brian Inglis via Cygwin , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: bash shell script: recently running, now failing In-Reply-To: <6bb05948-2362-6cb8-532a-2dfd59a746d3@Shaw.ca> References: <44687390 DOT 20230406152114 AT yandex DOT ru> <6bb05948-2362-6cb8-532a-2dfd59a746d3 AT Shaw DOT ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_THEBAT, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Andrey Repin via Cygwin Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: Andrey Repin Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 3388p2ta020878 Greetings, Brian Inglis via Cygwin! > On 2023-04-06 06:21, Andrey Repin via Cygwin wrote: >>> I have a "hash bang" bash shell script i.e. first line >>> #! /bin/sh >>> or equivalently >>> #! /bin/bash >> By default, sh is bash in base Cygwin installation. >>> Q3 - at 1/8 the size of bash and sh, I am not at all sure of the role and reach of dash. >>> Should the edit (dash replacing bash/sh) be incorporated elsewhere or would this be a >>> bad idea (and retained only locally in what is indeed an eccentric and one-off context)? >> I'm replacing /bin/sh with dash as I've found that even in POSIX mode, bash >> allows for a lot of bash'izms in scripts, which would not otherwise run under >> (d?a)?sh. >> See the post-install script attached. > You should use either a hard link or copy of d/ash from/to /bin/ to allow > it (or any shell) to be used from Windows cmd shells or Scheduled Tasks, That depends on your setup. /usr/bin/env is a real executable and it is a VERY good idea to handle Windows associations through it. But on my end it is covered by CYGWIN=winsymlinks:nativestrict and a more elaborate TCC-RT wrapper script which is again falling down to /usr/bin/env for the purposes of actually starting the program, be it a script or binary or… > which do not recognise Cygwin /usr mounts or symlinks, but can be run with > elevated privileges and at sometimes more useful points than user cron jobs. > For example, "manually" restarting Cygwin services after delayed startup, > stopping Cygwin services and processes before upgrades, and cleaning up cron > jobs that have not finished. That part is handled elsewhere already. > You should also consider changing the sh man page. That's a good idea, thanks. I never did "man sh" so never stumbled across that discrepancy. -- With best regards, Andrey Repin Saturday, April 8, 2023 11:31:34 Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple