X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AFB1D3858C1F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1680942945; bh=mwvU5+po/TwqyXSZMPA5Oh3Dqbrcmz7+9RAaon4qBFY=; h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=bGU9BPW6WRnDIV0+a+PHgfrMWrklaPKOjvxxd1tbEhoOYlxKiIE5dcC4SJSq4tVoK kBqvnC9OHKoOPHzXK9+Sklquc6fE4u15ARJlmv4DHEaBekS721EDHmnh2r+qeK0iLj FaSqXbDhfmW/hK4TL15ecEUx8YQunHWy+U+xS06w= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 130083858D1E X-Yandex-Fwd: 1 Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2023 11:30:47 +0300 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v9.3.4) Professional Message-ID: <174205789.20230408113047@yandex.ru> To: Thomas Schweikle , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Changing user home to overlap Windows user home possible? Or a bad idea? In-Reply-To: <5eae9f1f-9d58-d8a1-cf43-e6eeb77c7e1b@bfs.de> References: <5eae9f1f-9d58-d8a1-cf43-e6eeb77c7e1b AT bfs DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_THEBAT, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Andrey Repin via Cygwin Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: Andrey Repin Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" Greetings, Thomas Schweikle! > Is it possible to have the same home for Windows and cygwin? See /etc/nsswitch.conf and https://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/ntsec.html#ntsec-mapping-nsswitch > Using "C:\Users\" for Cygwin home setting mount points for users? I don't get this question. Can you please rephrase? > Or is this a bad idea? Or is it something which has some drawbacks you've > to decide to live with? At the moment the most ugly drawback is duplication > of various data needed within "C:\cygwin\home\" and "C:\Users\". > Would be nice if I could overlay both. There's some caveats to using %USERPROFILE% as $HOME, most notable, you have to be careful with overly sensitive programs, like SSH or GPG. Other than that, the noacl flag on the cygdrive mount will cover you for the time being. I.e.: >> none /cygdrive cygdrive noacl,binary,nouser,posix=0 0 0 And usertemp idea is also a good one: >> none /tmp usertemp binary,nouser,posix=0 0 0 -- With best regards, Andrey Repin Saturday, April 8, 2023 11:09:33 Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple