X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B8AC63858431 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1680784518; bh=yt/sAtrtdaPOMSiKbMJaBaCB6HzEe/lJywPCjIarip4=; h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=xSnRAZ4z8J4hRJTqLEdLXVvGOnqk2EmX0mguLsutK/lH39wfmVmczximlzym3OduY kyfaUXVm4a4je+HViFmwM+oMlZYX/c+lT8xi0yr852ZcFrizrCGJOWLPQgxfCDmBFO DLCU99F2x26gcKWycQMMESjyYxIX6juz+CRsZGYk= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 673233858D28 X-Yandex-Fwd: 1 Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 15:21:14 +0300 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v9.3.4) Professional Message-ID: <44687390.20230406152114@yandex.ru> To: Fergus Daly , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: bash shell script: recently running, now failing In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------0B21A80E01F925680" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_THEBAT, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Andrey Repin via Cygwin Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: Andrey Repin Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" ------------0B21A80E01F925680 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Greetings, Fergus Daly! > I have a "hash bang" bash shell script i.e. first line > #! /bin/sh > or equivalently > #! /bin/bash By default, sh is bash in base Cygwin installation. > Q3 - at 1/8 the size of bash and sh, I am not at all sure of the role and reach of dash. > Should the edit (dash replacing bash/sh) be incorporated elsewhere or would this be a > bad idea (and retained only locally in what is indeed an eccentric and one-off context)? I'm replacing /bin/sh with dash as I've found that even in POSIX mode, bash allows for a lot of bash'izms in scripts, which would not otherwise run under (d?a)?sh. See the post-install script attached. -- With best regards, Andrey Repin Thursday, April 6, 2023 15:18:19 Sorry for my terrible english... ------------0B21A80E01F925680 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="zp_dash-as-bin-sh.dash" Content-transfer-encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="zp_dash-as-bin-sh.dash" IyEvYmluL2Rhc2gKClsgLWYgL2Jpbi9kYXNoLmV4ZSBdIHx8IGV4aXQKCl9mPSIkKG1rdGVt cCAvYmluL3NoLnByZWxpbmsuWFhYWFhYKSIKClsgLUwgL2Jpbi9zaC5leGUgXSB8fCBtdiAv YmluL3NoLmV4ZSAiJF9mIgoKbG4gLWZzVCAvYmluL2Rhc2guZXhlIC9iaW4vc2guZXhlCmlm IFsgJD8gLWd0IDAgXTsgdGhlbgogICAgZWNobyAiR290IGEgcHJvYmxlbSBjcmVhdGluZyBs aW5rIGZvciAvYmluL3NoICEiID4mMgogICAgZXhpdCAxCmVsc2UKICAgIHJtICIkX2YiCmZp CgpleGl0IDAK ------------0B21A80E01F925680 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple ------------0B21A80E01F925680--