X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0ABDE3858439 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1676219754; bh=fmHT0CIrDRPJ7f9F/rCZcxzJHCzSgcjYhQoFM2uz49A=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=mtVrpqEiLs8jmFdinQknoEqmSn0CKol+2qQi/B2mA9atZUG+FgNAaq52RpnxwYbpg qHiyOEkklFpQb4f4TkVf2oWhKdp8BdfJmJg0bstdv/dsRfo/FEoiX67sqm4fQdLc/b Z/JHTv0wAaG8HzS73//DgETU/EATzQ5XBuNEySV4= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 7C80E3858D37 X-SNCR-Rigid: 613A8CC34E3D61C1 X-Originating-IP: [81.153.98.246] X-OWM-Source-IP: 81.153.98.246 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: jonturney AT btinternet DOT com X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=0/300, class=clean X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudehledgleduucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuueftkffvkffujffvgffngfevqffopdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddunecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfhfhfgjtgfgsehtkeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpeflohhnucfvuhhrnhgvhicuoehjohhnrdhtuhhrnhgvhiesughrohhnvggtohguvgdrohhrghdruhhkqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvtdetffekveevjeegheeglefhtdeggfeilefggfdutedufedvgefgieeiffdtveenucfkphepkedurdduheefrdelkedrvdegieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopegludelvddrudeikedruddruddtiegnpdhinhgvthepkedurdduheefrdelkedrvdegiedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjohhnrdhtuhhrnhgvhiesughrohhnvggtohguvgdrohhrghdruhhkpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedvpdhrtghpthhtoheptgihghifihhnsegthihgfihinhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehjhhhgsegrtghmrdhorhhg X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean Message-ID: Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 16:35:12 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.2 Subject: Re: Curious setup behavior? Content-Language: en-GB To: jhg AT acm DOT org, The Cygwin Mailing List References: <19227575-b1f5-e21d-8739-3b2033e8025a AT jhmg DOT net> In-Reply-To: <19227575-b1f5-e21d-8739-3b2033e8025a@jhmg.net> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1191.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FORGED_SPF_HELO, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Jon Turney via Cygwin Reply-To: Jon Turney Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" Sender: "Cygwin" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 31CGaIFP024047 On 02/02/2023 19:46, Jim Garrison via Cygwin wrote: > 1) Launch setup-x86_64 and go as far as the "Pending" list (assuming >    there are pending packages to be updated).  Note "Best" is selected. > > 2) Then click "Back" to get to the mirror selection page > > 3) Click "Next" again. > > Now it says there is nothing pending. > > 4) Click back (mirror selection) and re-select the same or a different >    mirror and click "Next" > > Still nothing pending, "Best" is still selected. > > 5) Select "Sync" instead of "Best" > > All the pending packages reappear.  Switching from "Sync" back to "Best" > does not affect the display at this point. Well, it does because these are two different things, but in most usual circumstances they select the same set of packages. (I think e.g. if you've previously installed a test version, they will give different results) > If you initially have "Sync" selected, then switching to "Best" reveals > the missing pending items.  I.e. restoring the list seems to be > "edge-triggered" on the "Keep/Best/Sync" state. Yes, this is almost certainly not implemented correctly. Unfortunately, this is complex, because of interactions with how we apply packages and selection modes selected via the command line. It's not clear at all to me what should happen here when those exist and you've then modified them in the chooser and then go back and forward. At the moment, the back button is always enabled, I think. There's probably some points in the flow where we shouldn't allow that. -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple