X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 39385385B209 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=ispras.ru Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ispras.ru MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2022 15:13:09 +0300 From: Alexey Izbyshev To: Takashi Yano Subject: Re: Deadlock of the process tree when running make In-Reply-To: <20220410163432.00dd7b9f81f8f322d97688f2@nifty.ne.jp> References: <9388316255ada0e0fcb2d849cce5a894 AT ispras DOT ru> <20220409191743 DOT 6da2268a36e8c9b4ab22c722 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> <1ecd670b1cdff43e0b0d7e5ee4c9cfc5 AT ispras DOT ru> <20220409204619 DOT dd0e53902d5e108ef462e510 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> <907ce1b4416a826cb07990dd601bd687 AT ispras DOT ru> <20220410015753 DOT 753e2a238513eaf2a3da81e9 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> <20220410025410 DOT 196aa0a04368147dbbb31d3e AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> <7204ed0aa2d6b3fcfb239010e6b67646 AT ispras DOT ru> <20220410163432 DOT 00dd7b9f81f8f322d97688f2 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.4 Message-ID: <0e1a53626639cb21369225ff9092ecfc@ispras.ru> X-Sender: izbyshev AT ispras DOT ru X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DOS_RCVD_IP_TWICE_B, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On 2022-04-10 10:34, Takashi Yano wrote: > On Sat, 09 Apr 2022 23:26:51 +0300 > Thanks for investigating. In the normal case, conhost.exe is terminated > when hWritePipe is closed. Thanks for confirming. > > Possibly, the hWritePipe has incorrect handle value. I've verified that the handle was correct by attaching via gdb to the hanging bash and checking that hWritePipe field is now zeroed (which happens only in the branch where _HandleIsValid returns true and hWritePipe is closed). I've found something interesting though. I've modeled a similar situation on another machine: 1. I've run a native process via bash. 2. I've attached to bash via gdb and set a breakpoint on ClosePseudoConsole(). 3. I've killed the native process. 4. The breakpoint was hit, and I looked at hWritePipe value. ProcessHacker shows it as "Unnamed file: \FileSystem\Npfs". Both bash and conhost had a single handle with such name, and after I've forcibly closed it in the bash process (while it was still suspended by gdb), conhost.exe indeed died. Then I looked at the original hanging tree and found that the hanging bash.exe still has a single handle displayed as "Unnamed file: \FileSystem\Npfs". I don't know how to check what kernel object it refers to, but at least its access rights are the same as for hWritePipe that I've seen on another machine, and its handle count is 1. So could it be another copy of hWritePipe, e.g. due to some handle leak? I don't know how to verify whether this suspicious handle in bash.exe is paired with "Unnamed file: \FileSystem\Npfs" in conhost.exe, other than by forcibly closing it. If I close it and conhost.exe dies, it will confirm "the extra handle" theory, but will also prevent further investigation with the hanging tree. Do you have any advice? Thanks, Alexey -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple