X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org AF3783857806 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=SystematicSw.ab.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=systematicsw.ab.ca X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=PbTsOwtd c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=623a0b27 a=oHm12aVswOWz6TMtn9zYKg==:117 a=oHm12aVswOWz6TMtn9zYKg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=iMpC6L0jGsNNbTZxuiUA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 11:45:11 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: cygwin-64 + multiarch package (32bit gcc) Content-Language: en-CA To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: From: Brian Inglis Organization: Systematic Software In-Reply-To: X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfO1CVL/zKBX4XB74XKhji/5o97//lEYzMhDBAb5inrXYORf2y+qOj+AOHIjjCGBL9YHMQ+V6RsPKpUMhXnLYBGnOBFrIanFDFvgeZO+UhbbF0zrNfRnc kIwK1CYicUtaom6e9WCuQh3dPoHDmcyQ6Ys9TXHcRrjpl3QxsLs5SxgfsD1KVTWTj4GjOsR5RhpFj18zGVSCUgRgIVxaajW/SYk= X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1164.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On 2022-03-22 07:25, Pach Roman (PS-EC/ESG4) via Cygwin wrote: > are there any plans to get the multiarch package ported to Cygwin? > What would be interesting for me, is to have an 32-bit gcc running in 64-bit Cygwin. Have a look at packages prefixed cygwin32 under 64 bit and cygwin64 under 32 bit: cygwin{32,64}{,-binutils,-default-manifest,-gcc-ada,-gcc-cilkplus,-gcc-core, -gcc-fortran,-gcc-g++,-gcc-objc,-gcc-objc++,-gettext,-libbfd,-libiconv, -libtool,-minizip,-w32api-headers,-w32api-runtime,-zlib} but they may not have been updated for some time. -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. [Data in binary units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.] -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple