X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org A27703858D3C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nifty.ne.jp Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nifty.ne.jp DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-06.nifty.com 22B99Ttm030929 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.ne.jp; s=dec2015msa; t=1646989770; bh=iT4O06+xHb5RnJZ/hrE49NNTuhtWbgxD4dOmlPzphzE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KknIPTFDntnknDSHbeXPhgO7hAbg2K0K5SSlWLkCuBBqAek6faY7Ml4cyA2HPKGJ1 wWZLvlvPaKv9xtJX4MuOSPAabgdgStKH/vS1buzIPAmzzSeAEm0P25M3DPD0yWagMJ KCUqcX7zoBmhGGDQ/1orkI9DbEjbB6VnkgvXdpkMw1P2T0A4Ehn8m1ipJjH7wd1k39 vIMAZI/mqvmMXnqfNhv6GT1am3JTPcyVd9uAfAoBpojG2uT9QYWwtaykIVWsAn4Vqv 5OFGeFvBM8hp8hVCXDooE2CWDkAs2IZPRJdL+YXqkVMREvO6/i1QTr34fCpAZL1HOC M6/fQbrGoV48Q== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [119.150.36.16] Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 18:09:30 +0900 From: Takashi Yano To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Too many level of symbolic links (still have problem with sbmfs network drives) Message-Id: <20220311180930.e0ca6a9bf1b9f0f5c7f9fb5e@nifty.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <20220309095840.2a1d82b207922c9a4c8badab@nifty.ne.jp> References: <21ce8733-b5b9-4f04-516a-c674b3cf1162 AT polymtl DOT ca> <20220305112326 DOT 8d07e89f03eb382f58023055 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> <20220308001455 DOT 9da9b8e10b76e9350c22520a AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> <03fc13d6-55c0-3fd3-87c0-857d026a1d1a AT polymtl DOT ca> <20220309085213 DOT 6e6a2cf2bf842eb51e9dd0d5 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> <4bf8ea5a-4afb-e3ee-e177-5dc3053340a4 AT polymtl DOT ca> <20220309095840 DOT 2a1d82b207922c9a4c8badab AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Philippe Debanne

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 09:58:40 +0900 Takashi Yano wrote: > On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 19:16:29 -0500 > Philippe Debanne wrote: > > Yes OK, you can send me the DLL, I will test it in the next couple of days. > > Thanks for your cooperation. I have just sent you cygwin1.dll > for the test. Please test it and let me know the resulted > debug messages. I received the debug messages and understood what is happening. I added a workaround for this issue, so could you please test the cygwin1.dll with the workaround patch, and let me know the test result? I will send you the patched cygwin1.dll shortly. -- Takashi Yano -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple