X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 3429F3858C74 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=scRHuLt9VkuHj2wBtXnWOdxLVp2rIh9SKANCxWsliLs=; b=ot+lEPArMHik8rHppCzvZJdFPzojzKPFU/Oi+WyiZMSB1iWUfH0zDgvZN2ep1Cy1QX OguBneGGWb+hFyaBNGkYsCbCn0QPNEmyAXRKp/3fXMWiIYmfmHNzyI4PLaxxOMCg9yF/ 7kTVRVqNeXXQTKQcdANhwiRHW3j9ovyUAzNJj6JvilVzRCdp637/WvAWa6asfdlMVp1e NSOAAUQ2iu6ePj7J7QsgmvTqbFzLJQrrXY6qlJB7uRgfUgtaDyfLoo4g/FuNuCacKNaO ve11OAsejNVUYQyv4/7/NRD0C7VK3j1hHxTbXFMAnhF6fhWA6j11U72L/t9crIpFMfBe WqYw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=scRHuLt9VkuHj2wBtXnWOdxLVp2rIh9SKANCxWsliLs=; b=DPPbUjhYeEvr1/Pu+BMfGpa0m6kDKdyin0PgaRL7RhQc9dnGyXsin25HY+WD+EcNzv 1tIVpWlMJVJFbAMIa5RjUKNlBBSIwfyXknbGIYBGuCyKqJhsD+xfYl0Gr3U19LtXi/3s Wsoz/s5CKTQAlCvRrEVvGmriDQZkABVDo2k1MskijXWZyo2rVngm9SjuaRNOks+HhcVM vm/MipvsetLP0PmcwUI4/66npIeVNTO+RTlBp/ny8O6vyMCXuFL/tSG7IWLgHSp4PW5O /98Dgtek9inPVmsa2cTgZLrgBQrDpjZi4C3XkWhi6y3hT0rxmrd0QQk1EIXiZ7YcU6FM k9PQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532f4ofosCS0SZXjXBgszDvU0kl/rVUerJCw2RUULh17BvfY5OSI Avg5bLrJ6CraV4HXiE5sFmCO3XNt46Gy0EywwEsqwCcNT/o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzp6DrTvn99A8QdmO0Qu/dySHJSHPfP25qsXLxi8Sk2BrZT3y3eJmgWN5BlR3ds6jSHuWOwPYfj41jTpIXJWRk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6871:5c3:: with SMTP id v3mr1303174oan.257.1644929432503; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 04:50:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220215123941 DOT yxesbunapq3gaxgq AT lucy DOT dinwoodie DOT org> In-Reply-To: <20220215123941.yxesbunapq3gaxgq@lucy.dinwoodie.org> From: Russell VT Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 04:50:22 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Trouble trying to compile apache2 To: Adam Dinwoodie X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: cygwin Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Cygwin" Thanks for the clarification, Adam. I've been meaning/wanting to step up and take care of some Cygwin packages, given that it's generally my Unix after from my desktop environment sort of arrangement ... and, well, I have a Jenkins server that has some free cycles on it (particularly for things like nightly, off-hours builds/pipelines). TLDR; I will start digging in to it, myself... may not have too much spare time, at least this week, until the weekend. Thanks! On Tue, Feb 15, 2022, 4:40 AM Adam Dinwoodie wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:17:59PM -0800, Russell VT wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 2:26 PM Scott Wood <> wrote: > > > > > I'm trying to compile a current version of apache2 httpd under the > cygwin64 > > > environment. There is an older version of apache2 compiled in cygwin > but > > > it's orphaned and didn't include some of the ssl libs I needed. > > > > > > > Well, I wouldn't call it "orphaned" ... it's just a few dot revisions > > behind. Both 2.4.29 and 2.4.25 seem to be in the package list, and > current > > is 2.4.52 (2021/12/20) > > From a formal Cygwin package management perspective, the package is > orphaned. That is, the page at https://cygwin.com/cygwin-pkg-maint > lists the package as "ORPHANED", which means nobody is currently taking > specific responsibility for answering questions about the package or > providing updates in future. > > That obviously means that volunteers to maintain the package would > almost certainly be gladly received. I've not looked at how much work > is required to maintain this package, but as a maintainer for some other > packages, I can say it's not a lot of work, particularly if you'd be > getting the package compiling for your own purposes anyway. > > If you (where, by "you", I mean anyone reading this!) want to try taking > over the maintainership, there's a bunch of information about what's > required at https://cygwin.com/packaging-contributors-guide.html, and > the packagers' mailing list is active and helpful. Plus -- while we > seem to have mostly dropped the habit of awarding gold stars to folk > making contributions -- I think adopting an orphaned package is still > worthy of automatic listing at https://cygwin.com/goldstars/ > > Adam > > -- > Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple