X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 3A608385783F Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=m.gmane-mx.org X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: =?UTF-8?Q?Ren=c3=a9_Berber?= Subject: Re: Renaming (with 'mv') very large files is SLOW Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 09:13:59 -0600 Message-ID: References: <25079 DOT 63376 DOT 349893 DOT 86395 AT consult DOT pretender> Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On 1/31/2022 8:59 AM, Eliot Moss wrote: > On 1/31/2022 9:52 AM, cygwin AT kosowsky DOT org wrote: >> I tried renaming some very large files (20-40 GB) using: mv >> without changing the directory of course. >> >> The process took about 10-20 minutes with Task Manager showing >> disk activity of 100+ MB/s. >> >> Is there something about such large 'renaming' that actually >> results in the file being really moved (aka copied) rather than >> just renamed? > > The two places are probably on different volumes (loosely, different > disks). That requires a physical move, even under Linux. Your > volumes seem a bit slow to access - is one perhaps across a slow > network? The rates you cite suggest movement of 50Mb/s (50Mb read + > 50Mb write = 100Mb overall). For 40 Gb that should take 40Gb / 50Mb > = about 820 secs = a little under 14 mins. > > (When I say your volumes are slow, I speak from the luxury of having > a 2Tb solid state drive! Actually, those speeds may be reasonable > depending on the nature of your system.) > > If the two locations are on different drives, there's no real > avoiding this. Nope, I've also complained about this (long ago), if the two locations are the same remote drive... Cygwin moves the entire file over the network. I ended up writing my own Samba mv command. -- R. Berber -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple