X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B319D385C415 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1643138452; bh=YphEyOtJUKQL1ftpv5HcJMMfYu+ebM4M3w24/0x+6Oo=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Reply-To:From; b=LJvGctP5qSYDeG7RyTRNuDNgX/hag16ewL1ZZxId1t4c1w5oDt/o4/C8RMkkx9eTI v0LCRztycJj4k13bfZ38Z41D7l5pMh72Uwym/JGvYBevGoOFOTs7ASZZXW8OXYbihx YqoxgoQRV+KMA6KnrolAO3QUpIxuoxwpzUsje9I4= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 3F264385AC33 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 20:19:42 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Duplicate ACLs? - Can't copy file even with Admin permissions Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <25043 DOT 7019 DOT 643488 DOT 389876 AT consult DOT pretender> <8735m12k3u DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <25047 DOT 23325 DOT 33020 DOT 646017 AT consult DOT pretender> <25048 DOT 43238 DOT 484068 DOT 737126 AT consult DOT pretender> <25063 DOT 30447 DOT 365452 DOT 499124 AT consult DOT pretender> <25066 DOT 48079 DOT 253017 DOT 253466 AT consult DOT pretender> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <25066.48079.253017.253466@consult.pretender> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:YXcb2zTWiPm78SuXHieylmu18MnkNOkY1HOrk4z4dGsqP0QT9Vv R+KaIAby5zwl8LcPJGqhChrvbJsOJ8roB5k4BZ8w3eQDVkVREZ4w3V+SN2mho7h7vVjEzvu QfN5Op9eA5nxoU3oYubvttmCcsXCbYh5Im7iDuepH/2RbBXNVxX4V8cZCMfvsme4IvlOm3I zFEqFpTZYDgLsKq90IHIA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:M3KFmrmV+rM=:gk8hyVIln0J4pmxKoidvjZ N2wNtPtFpKmCqwUpd2iY6FcYVTJVQybPY3xmDj8apA6c1xMvhojbmlfhhOd4Qh0mWndwgyPNx E3fyxbsdPGvb/JKojTcO5Oe4KZ0TNC/MgXLRGpkAb6U23Arml2EfqGqRodRIziVg9+RuygJ90 J+JHzxP/OG+/8VJnlz1qJVGEWovvisaoSBFqiOSJSGqkJoNBi+H4XfGxQvbVGot9RIAEszXwJ ciKR5XvxrGhTP3qKmZKgS2Ib5CnNoH9Ii6qlAvFlflqPO0n2DeN+R9ia7dUY/Te8xIh146Xrt rNOl+9deFdLGLXCxOS2a54Fsv40MNb9e8oO4SX6PQCBRAQkG+hh36axMWjYhyAlweXWmC2lTE +hG1EX8FNw4ltjyZYjQcVmk+M+4vwez5yfiHSf0D+yjjsrcBd1o0XxkuH5xNiTFRTSjIluFvg PhscFzjvx5zSLfRG90QPDod4Uh1NORVLP96UsoKLOVhSsYIYjNTnVBLqexNrJs6lWXoG2//Wu vs5MO1ealB6p0CTHlEvWtTHkYvAbjrvkTyFoYbKGUvegoOKcpS1kwpKfIWIeUceXI2sJB04HO 053iwuGpGd4thEv3TJxnLdNukfCHsXk3UUt8iwaj6zpZ9wt49hgnF0RhIjEnKj+vL8JN/D2NJ eIoBhR5bSxPYYiEibL20oJSgdD2xmUtuTObyhHYjKnLgDSJ7jUxcxIe7q/WKdX89BvMhjlzfy +0Xy/Oqcp+tlGrcv X-Spam-Status: No, score=-97.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN, KAM_DMARC_NONE, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_FAIL, SPF_HELO_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On Jan 21 08:57, cygwin AT kosowsky DOT org wrote: > Hi Corinna, > I found another file with ACLs that fail even under the new snapshot > cygwin1.dll. > > #getfacl setup.ilg > # file: setup.ilg > # owner: Administrators > # group: None > getfacl: setup.ilg: Invalid argument > > #icacls.exe setup.ilg > setup.ilg NT SERVICE\TrustedInstaller:(I)(F) > NT SERVICE\TrustedInstaller:(I)(CI)(IO)(F) > NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM:(I)(F) > NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM:(I)(OI)(CI)(IO)(F) > BUILTIN\Administrators:(I)(F) > BUILTIN\Administrators:(I)(OI)(CI)(IO)(F) > BUILTIN\Users:(I)(RX) > BUILTIN\Users:(I)(OI)(CI)(IO)(GR,GE) > CREATOR OWNER:(I)(OI)(CI)(IO)(F) > > #icacls.exe setup.ilg /save setup.acl > #cat setup.acl > setup.ilg > D:(A;ID;FA;;;S-1-5-80-956008885-3418522649-1831038044-1853292631-2271478464)(A;CIIOID;GA;;;S-1-5-80-956008885-3418522649-1831038044-1853292631-2271478464)(A;ID;FA;;;SY)(A;OICIIOID;GA;;;SY)(A;ID;FA;;;BA)(A;OICIIOID;GA;;;BA)(A;ID;0x1200a9;;;BU)(A;OICIIOID;GXGR;;;BU)(A;OICIIOID;GA;;;CO) > > ------------- > Any thoughts on what might be wrong here? Again, the permissions don't make sense. However, that's no good reason for Cygwin to bail out like this. I found the culprit, the core function was still setting a certain indicator value for default ACEs even on files. I pushed a patch and created new developer snapshots. Thanks, Corinna -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple