X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 9A7A83858D35 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nifty.ne.jp Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nifty.ne.jp DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-01.nifty.com 20FAKUOP001391 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.ne.jp; s=dec2015msa; t=1642242030; bh=01A110Es5Hwe7EQUjdSiNQ2exLThFEYxd6a0O2iLydM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=E3V58+4uftTBYsqSCuMl9LSEamUl6Yd1pq9Dr/U6o0JYgnOijZQaV2nrt5VMHy1oB gv+ljQorExO8HHA1NJz4PchCnfTi7EPTL4sj7B8Bn4NxPBNXlkyQl+uMEXvbwa1aOp Ws3kPuikQyuXpxCyVBc5W7+8sn0zwaXRQx0L3plUr0qKcAagXlOmy5A9pZrOUeJCgA hCzsAuKMWJB/kS3ztzhHKthDWcUMpy3ESDMY1pjNRhnBzFsCHCT+J4bLO+nk+7U//U oZUz8Gn+uJeCW8efuxqDe/ESgUJ8MXmwWTQFq3F8BiTcoTfFR8aBrQE+MxyEl5WfgL 1lwloLO4d7EUA== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [14.3.233.132] Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2022 19:20:30 +0900 From: Takashi Yano To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Segmentation fault due to double free for archetype. Message-Id: <20220115192030.de26356820d839eec3227e70@nifty.ne.jp> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, GIT_PATCH_0, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Cygwin" Hi, I found the following test case causes segmentation fault in 32 bit cygwin. #include #include #include int main() { for (int i = 0; i < 256; i++) { printf("\r%d, %d\n", i, open("/dev/ptmx", O_RDWR | O_NOCTTY)); } return 0; } The test case results in: $ ./a.exe 0, 3 1, 4 2, 5 [...] 125, 128 126, 129 0 [main] a 50 tty_list::allocate: No pty allocated 127, -1 1549 [main] a 50 tty_list::allocate: No pty allocated 128, -1 3047 [main] a 50 tty_list::allocate: No pty allocated 129, -1 4625 [main] a 50 tty_list::allocate: No pty allocated 130, -1 6477 [main] a 50 tty_list::allocate: No pty allocated Segmentation fault (core dumped) I looked into this problem and found that this is due to free'ing archetype which was already free'ed by _cfree(). The mechanism of the problem is: 1) archetype is added to archetypes[] at line 675 in dtable.cc when trying to open pty. 2) Opening pty fails because too many ptys are opened. 3) archetype is deleted at line 444 in fhandler.cc. 4) archetype is copied from archetypes[] at line 659 in dtable.cc which is already free'ed in step 3) when trying to open pty again. 5) Opening pty fails again. 6) archetype which was already free'ed in step 3) is deleted at line 444 in fhandler.cc. I am not sure why this does not happen in 64 bit cygwin. I guess double free does not cause segfault by chance in 64 bit cygwin. I also found the following patch fixes the issue. Is this the right thing? diff --git a/winsup/cygwin/fhandler.cc b/winsup/cygwin/fhandler.cc index fc7c0422e..e51208117 100644 --- a/winsup/cygwin/fhandler.cc +++ b/winsup/cygwin/fhandler.cc @@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ fhandler_base::open_with_arch (int flags, mode_t mode) || open (flags, mode & 07777))) { if (archetype) - delete archetype; + cygheap->fdtab.delete_archetype (archetype); } else if (archetype) { -- Takashi Yano -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple