X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3FB0738A7C22 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1641895763; bh=XUkn8oEW4eZ5D7lbUVS0E9jAXe7ZEEmMgIQeQWhVj4o=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Reply-To:From; b=Sl0Mo7lixYFJYqz3xVKbGfGmeJcDBvsNgP3CzM7FC5Ki5tStx+Q2X/r4i1WFm9EPP WPLLDQd9fFxKvXW8x1qarZpgxaolfXxQwJhRdD3k/0COQfL0mQB8kBQ+eqBnDkHqE+ IkxQvl11/KHX7pcmzA76NIp6WFOFMd6p7TbBQd1s= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org B12DC38A1423 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:07:27 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: posix_spawn issues on i686 Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:O0QPSWGNoeMOBlobnIZk2JKFrSWTQTktEM+rguw4tItyGddPj6h fH8QGrKkkCnw7O9a1Vt0L+b+Sv+OA9tQwbr8/1vOcDPtu2rPGDgpW24sZliB9MYZm+dU3J8 U6AkL6ihy/y7ZP52uIBmqrqAsykA3rwC0MgivTnZ90e/f96qDXg3jcpgKsElsGQkdKVsoMG R2RzHD16pWGbETTOlyh/w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:oYWxcIpU28Y=:ttNAKESUY4k8cthBSYQF0O gzWLgI63H1HZsiHiwGkZwyitS87EjiVQIgWl0OC/s0D4XiN+HkQbqBTj2bJFko0yaCYltqWtg 4kwGQ4VwRUgbiYCPlXPT0xYaaBJTwzZX6p4WcEzxRDCZIivCYFrOSEucTKuUdPuaHTsG8ycg9 Qd/RyKknYt3N0nyoIdN4socKrekISdZ656Thh/yt9Dh3KBzi6kNwU65ej15zVxra+01OjZRV3 KOCAM0tAATjRfnWjfpIQu4FUQVnssMaOslnC6q0T4bAxoboqVZsf2yCwwSVcnobDrt8WTBLp5 cFHQ3hZs5vAVWud3+IQEN0JlwbJxbOPFlFNtpgvV+yLHfwReYT9dUJXfEuvWchx/l4NxMaFIe v6vUbX7YHniLF72bkg+W5fyq4OsInBuaP9dklPo3ShF+0GjHshwiRpcaQwJ5sy3XvE5sGorbf SrM80Zt+eGw4K6MBwOSw6VrKKmv8LUxoeyggBr96PulrKRP9s2Npq0nvue7bquUVKLKt8mwEr QjiHv0V6iLamwDmKfNKByXBdjhBeWjSJH33r5ALHG7k1ni46v6spAVWGJHqlbp3f44tWYdOJ4 RSMk8IlpDE1ntJBy8Du6lQBOUFm+V0Gvw47wqyPBl6Qt0bPoBOeGQPbB0IryW06H8ke+YTdBv TMgPzJtP/uacyIkse6qiKNabeuaOTECsVLizCoveVnOaxKwhQQsgJDLk1lZPmQ1cGBo53frRO PM/TmIGTZuDyERDH X-Spam-Status: No, score=-91.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN, KAM_DMARC_NONE, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_FAIL, SPF_HELO_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On Jan 10 11:38, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin wrote: > >From https://github.com/msys2/MSYS2-packages/issues/2801 > > MSYS2 recently rebuilt GNU make 4.3, and I found that after rebuilding, it > broke rather horribly on i686, where any attempt to run a command resulted > in "Invalid argument" errors. Some debugging revealed that rebuilding > make resulted in it using posix_spawn now instead of vfork. Passing > --disable-posix-spawn to make's configure script results in a working i686 > make. > > >From the MSYS2 bug report: > > """ > For reference, I tried to rebuild "make" in cygwin 32 bit and it has the > same problem: > > rebuilding cygport make.cygport all results in a broken make > Adding CYGCONF_ARGS="--disable-posix-spawn" to the cygport file and > rebuilding again results in a good make > A Makefile to reproduce the issue: > > all: > echo hi > """ > > In addition, make check fails rather horribly as well. > > I know that 32-bit is on the way out, but it is concerning to me that > there is some latent bug lurking in this code path that is apparently not > well exercised. Can you create a simple, self-contained testcase in plain C? Thanks, Corinna -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple