X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B691B385800B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1638959896; bh=99V3CLD0JY8Y6iFzNy2c1Z5dL33wtj8O/f8NA0x13MY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Reply-To:From; b=tKwbYJrtQ4hlUNi2EpWcqbqf1F6xrF26z1CVpOo2q0eLwLSZS3B2KYUuUnSvwtDwQ tLig1Ei3wBf+QG1D+GiFj2RbghIO4bT8IehT0o/EBqXZuPv/1DLn6ZOfAye8RN3akJ kC1k60fvwr1lhiQ8HxH9gDQujmSQdVud7qmwQFXE= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 080273858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 11:37:39 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: vboxsharedfs - Too many levels of symbolic links Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20211208172008 DOT 01b11239c374604abf638a19 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211208172008.01b11239c374604abf638a19@nifty.ne.jp> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:naXLOUaNLIEvTYkzVBBcwvyy7+BZMTj1X9OC6T7KBsuT0h+/F8T qnByBctPu5Y7DNPXmYdnIfqRf13VhYdAarNbat8NwV/Mb0Q6GuiP0ON0SN0zTN2ufjUaOdw i7qwFpM0wwpGWRstCgVqyB4uvFS0yKkbWq6nN/rwXAZ3THudWD6P/e/D9xnaRC3Mmer5xSq HhZGTCc6bXzVIHHqrDplg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:CZWP6kRHw7s=:NN5tlS8PafHtsG0E7ymb14 AghgjGa/apJxeRYvwR2HCi4y+ykh/fkQ7rux2C9rALrmq/9JSYHltulhKLRovv8qlLweVe9Ek VtSjlHccv0BShTpa20xtCG0BEE5AY/nGhAwoREkeJPybZBVZPRlNxHqoJB8iqpJtwpfbR11ij x3azmlBAObGXqQvIQuuRLDP4JibFGJx1S4AU7Zb3A/GJAX4pqcnxjmANMPg+QsdYaiSyf2WzL i3i1UmSWChnMoDJN8EDF9tnkuLZ3mStGS1HFdRqnXLUIkzFePt6WUvAOm62oRD1bo+cIFQa7j 9HFaK4AWGQgDlmLfTPEdlokjlbKlFgn3bzz89RiGKHatJ7q7kQZRKH1QqgyOKqXkYu4Zc/yCl U+wZl8XxBdInVXm9bJbeFIU+Xog+mZgPFoO04/shrppQsTEu1r5o0GRdkkHxR9vE6uw5gt13A VKL+rk3Rh0j0Wa3RzUhZFvcG1G9A6IRafqp+hhKHUEM7lEyx0EqUP07B1T627ZuKQWYsBDtnB 5YIZFeP0+q+xk4m1Np4mxpMRFi9hi8R1k75Ter2ydXs0gCWsFJc0h3YiCgEMhcq6Of+fJDzay ++FWaQobFGyz9DUBVSaiKs8+nabBOwspdRkRM06o1ZEOQ24QCqo71OV/2lK+M0XN/+T7NRF1j uQ2tRi0/7Cq7ZtQmGKh9EFvD+hGzcXgF/FiEuHbUyw3lOBc8KG/KvwXTMiyjlvfObZuAQfi6m FQoZ7ueXJnDoIDgt X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN, KAM_DMARC_NONE, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NEUTRAL, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On Dec 8 17:20, Takashi Yano wrote: > On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 18:15:42 +0100 > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Hi Takashi, > > > > ----- Forwarded message from Corinna Vinschen ----- > > > The idea of the GFPNBH call is to short-circuit the path_conv handling > > > in case we have native Windows symlinks in the path. My example above > > > was only considering what comes out of the `if ((pc_flags & ...) { ... } > > > ' expression starting in line 3485 (assuming "b" is a native symlink). > > > > > > What I mean is this: Your patch disregards the entire string returned by > > > GFPNBH, if the returned path is an UNC path, no matter what. > > > > > > But what if the incoming path already *was* an UNC path, and potentially > > > contains native symlinks? In that case you have no reason to disregard > > > the resulting path from GFPNBH. > > > > > > And if it was a drive letter path, wouldn't it be nicer to just convert > > > the UNC path prefix back to the drive letter and keep the rest of the > > > final path intact? > > > > > > However, both of these scenarios require extra code, which isn't that > > > important for now, so, never mind. > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > What I meant is something like the below (entirely untested). Yeah, I'm > > not sure myself, if it's worth the effort... > > [...] > I confirmed that your patch works nicely. > > ...except when the drive is created by subst using UNC path, > e.g. subst w: \\server\share. > > In this case, WNetGetConnectionW() fails with ERROR_NO_NET_OR_BAD_PATH. > > So, I modified your patch a bit. > > What about attached patch? Oh, great! GetVolumePathNameW is the function I somehow missed when looking into the Microsoft docs yesterday, so thanks for modifying the patch this way. Please push. Corinna -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple