X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 0ECF63858C27
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
 header.from=SystematicSw.ab.ca
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 spf=none smtp.mailfrom=systematicsw.ab.ca
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=B4F8bMhM c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=61209ef5
 a=T+ovY1NZ+FAi/xYICV7Bgg==:117 a=T+ovY1NZ+FAi/xYICV7Bgg==:17
 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=iMpC6L0jGsNNbTZxuiUA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <DM5PR19MB09866B847CF73BACB2A6B74693C19 AT DM5PR19MB0986 DOT namprd19 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com>
 <87v9406mbx DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>
 <DM5PR19MB09860D67880A52111FA265AB93C29 AT DM5PR19MB0986 DOT namprd19 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com>
From: Brian Inglis <Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
Organization: Systematic Software
Subject: Re: Problem with mail archives?
Message-ID: <6950aecd-508a-c0a0-6d1d-532970592bce@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2021 00:36:37 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DM5PR19MB09860D67880A52111FA265AB93C29@DM5PR19MB0986.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Language: en-CA
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfOk80b/YaUmEia6rD5PGqbOPo0RfdMxbAaK8iW33Zy0mwVIjuGqnCDJrqLfHVzWgxA2jcZWHGIVnPCH2nUKuTcOT8gWRwH9Ad+j8yZ6y+yuClLo7BVDG
 Ce1vzCCYer7dY2hx9N85LK4vz4XYZYdqa8K+9MoKmIYAQhAFi/goWGjL19NcHKt6zEpXCNLvkIk6vCg/I3XQs+9XPrJYRThOGRM=
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1161.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
 KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,
 TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 17L6avkd013973

On 2021-08-20 21:21, André Bleau via Cygwin wrote:
> Achim Gratz via Cygwin writes:
>> André Bleau via Cygwin writes:
>>> I noticed that no message has been archived for cygwin-patches since
>>> August 3rd, and to cygwin-developers since July 2nd.

>> What exactly makes you think that there were any messages that need to
>> be archived since those dates?

> cygwin-patches has usually more than 1 message per day. 18 days 
> without any message is very out of ordinary.
It's summer, it's August: many contributors, especially Europeans, may 
be taking vacations away from their screens; possibly even travelling!
There's normally week long gaps each month without messages:
and there are only four mail archive files per year for patches.

-- 
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.
[Data in binary units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.]

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple