X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 8C738385043E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=nexgo.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nexgo.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nexgo.de; s=vfde-smtpout-mb-15sep; t=1628015822; bh=kN56jAvbcpjOpxcf0gTIQE0xX2t0DSmT0jHVkZKg5/c=; h=From:To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=keKlbchWktk6R9ORoNQJpXchfY6F11f8w4WqnQ88M/RxuOocd28RR8F1POgk4Yb+A sOMqTYxjMYHUpJrKpvU/t2kLAxGLm3iBCYF+GbykTVLV6sOBrWvOd7ehk5BlDLll6a SI3obH630a7FgD4KnbhB0fyFUfpJbXEuiddy9RvU= From: Achim Gratz To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: libidn update broke curl References: <05788187e0be4bc4b925c79b66b3cc91 AT severstal DOT com> <3d8b7a73-f934-e82e-06e3-c8030919c933 AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca> Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 20:36:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: <3d8b7a73-f934-e82e-06e3-c8030919c933@SystematicSw.ab.ca> (Brian Inglis's message of "Tue, 3 Aug 2021 10:05:29 -0600") Message-ID: <87r1fav0hj.fsf@Rainer.invalid> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-purgate-type: clean X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information) X-purgate: clean X-purgate-size: 1530 X-purgate-ID: 155817::1628015821-00007455-B9B29C00/0/0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3032.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" Brian Inglis writes: > But I didn't believe Cygwin Setup would replace packages that are > still dependencies of installed packages, unless you explicitly ask it > to remove obsolete packages, rather than unneeded dependencies. > > Unless it was due to my marking libidn12 as obsoleting libidn11? You never do that in this situation, since it tells setup to install libidn12 while removing libidn11, which it dutifully did. Why'd you even get the idea that you should obsolete libidn11? > Maintainers: is that something that we should not do on a package ABI > break? No, not at all. You never obsolete library packages unless they really need to be removed and replaced by something else. > How should maintainers handle such situations in cygport? Nothing to do there, move along. the older library version continues to exist and is used until all packages that depend on it have updated. > I would like to know the correct approach to take to mitigate this and > future such situations before I create a curl -2 package release. What you should check is that there is no transitive dependency to libidn11 left in the dependency chain for anything that depends on a package that uses the newer version. If that is possible you ideally need to update all involved packages together. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ SD adaptations for KORG EX-800 and Poly-800MkII V0.9: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#KorgSDada -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple