X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 421B4382CC05
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1626891702;
	bh=N9Bh05k1ck8oDtcgJSNgcklqw/n1Bl4NTpJB1GD3A4c=;
	h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	 List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	 From;
	b=BgpvbiPPhftmpR5vUy4xCInxogxRaJNReNJsYKhZGd2CY2N5NhDtl8esFLlFFX3/+
	 uP+8N+EjKchri0sizJCSsvm9f9usVg/8/OtjkRhgpawfiBrSB+wKrcAgB1LmQ9QpS4
	 cX0nn/l6BjgYe/VkIpp/U8bwterz+vJGHQLaHZFQ=
X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org DBBEB383F41F
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
 :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=FWARzty9O7jLPHvvQfEAzZh8yK2wzmYn97zm9DB06ms=;
 b=TtNnEjVgnjmXh8yK2XlWRto/sCR9bLeIhxEsKxICgdKffW+5A4WLRfUJiuLjaOEfK4
 YSi/gkpedOHVrhyneR8L/C/+bROhrfhG6dEU9fTdDB9b8TCANaG60xbSdsP4RD/VUo7S
 SF42U4NiA2EK41hxRKbmuSkDr2NFCvawsUTILCxdRWN2KRby1IzIb8YkIAzMvLWmjxRc
 yJDexr4clGFHV0CAB0d6kLVXqP5y68ZtvhMh9iad5NZFyHY7XClEY+LW9v159pmyGH1u
 oYkgm2LRejqHtauJDOOKG9dS5q0rP/8hVQQj6Bca+vP0bY+BNjj/dgeNUowZEflDr4vj
 YpbQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531gv6/ZAg3hx5X3polV2o6Vfg+pLia1AaoPh7Ju30ATT5bGxUhH
 6yRhSP8M/+usXV4P9l9amcmIIlj8sMbJOg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxDIbnwPSZJzp/+cEMP+HbVienIDKbMxX9eEhTLAXcqFA8loIHXRPtQkRLDU6haAghvKz+kpQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4d07:: with SMTP id z7mr40586782wrt.244.1626891670891; 
 Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: no regular expressions in less
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <72a2e4e4-1745-905a-d068-5263c928433d AT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID: <28f95bc8-5e8a-9732-7bba-769c5c45d6b7@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 20:21:09 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <72a2e4e4-1745-905a-d068-5263c928433d@gmail.com>
Content-Language: it
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From: Marco Atzeri via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: Marco Atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On 21.07.2021 19:43, Basin Ilya via Cygwin wrote:
> Hi list.
> I've just noticed that regexp search works identically to exact match search in less and it prints this:
> 
>      $ /usr/bin/less --version
>      less 581.2 (no regular expressions)
>      Copyright (C) 1984-2021  Mark Nudelman
>      
>      less comes with NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
>      For information about the terms of redistribution,
>      see the file named README in the less distribution.
>      Home page: https://greenwoodsoftware.com/less
> 
> How to solve this?

Hi Basin,

it seems missing for the 32bit version,
on 64bit it is present.

$ less --version
less 581.2 (PCRE2 regular expressions)
Copyright (C) 1984-2021  Mark Nudelman

But for both the library is present

$ cygcheck -cd |grep "pcre.*devel"
libpcre-devel                           8.45-1
libpcre2-devel                          10.37-1

let me investigate why the 32bit has such issue.

Regards
Marco

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple