X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org C63853846075 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=towo.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=towo AT towo DOT net Subject: Re: mintty overstrokes some fonts unexpectedly To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20210425224102 DOT FF0E DOT 50F79699 AT gmail DOT com> <4660c89e-6cdd-1fda-f754-a9289f281ba3 AT towo DOT net> <20210426081451 DOT EC3F DOT 50F79699 AT gmail DOT com> From: Thomas Wolff Message-ID: <19bb84cb-c503-238a-513f-42e8cb3c19de@towo.net> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 20:31:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210426081451.EC3F.50F79699@gmail.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:StO5AXhGeFYG294trOaSWtXO1OeZab9KQfMeS4vCOQKHvLd3jB9 9AoRh9bepCzmMC/DYixZUSMIBN82caDpUIr5cEBI7oMGL5eHyhDowKJV8XByuZAPfuKtgK6 0ODW8XfPph+Gi7UT0MVlRw51DUNYetANN6+AqHhdpRDkoLa282BKDPBAn8ST6SnxR+OtZGA lFG55HGVtEjXhokV4nhVw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:9HpNFEbfw1g=:I7EHV1BQJsu4LzbGHemP1V 75g+t+i2LE2oPx+7cQUvVj7xtmRI8851fIromyjdfNRfQaPCT36Y+L5eLHNgTjAyEUG5xC821 bVhsf94nrf9Ps5obQW0N3WNK3doci6Jty4zUQ6yNmV8JYi99zv/bv/YcDYPzaurS3TG5a5+hi Myw3M3hXZRc9rOPCuuLAP/RR0EAtsQn1/64I5K7n1YAj3QNSc2ApOxA5JOm5+mB+giDBkPk+F qBoNg1dnZ1FgtqHasPVsKJnwUFhXLi2G8uIE83YWxRBTzWJHMP82ReaCnntvXVJ2loFdwnrkm KUEZJWKxdscJOYGRf2XNChMnuAQ2tBkDmhh+gGmwlefL32mJf1mVI1wlb7p5/6sVPkJyRrGXt k/xgwCIlIIaa1jIYbzjkXdFNlss0WOiwE4c5FbcMbBi4Jluu12bcpugWKX7+ip0XMI1peYUIp Ok0BHG56nPqIky/WVMctkvMDZ4YQh3oHLArSJ1loAcj3ygsfPN7IOj9YrmtC8gG66cCXeJKcO OEyA3xhjyVCxuT7z4iGO0k= X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" Am 26.04.2021 um 01:14 schrieb Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin: > On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 22:33:57 +0200, Thomas Wolff >> Am 25.04.2021 um 15:41 schrieb Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin: >>> Hi! >>> >>> mintty overstrokes some fonts unexpectedly. >>> https://gitlab.com/test.cases/mintty-test/-/tree/54ae800e695ecd1741851cab57320a9d0e95a6fd >>> >>> I got a result mintty-sample-msgothic.png. >>> https://gitlab.com/test.cases/mintty-test/-/blob/54ae800e695ecd1741851cab57320a9d0e95a6fd/mintty-sample-msgothic.png >>> >>> In the 4th line of the output, fonts (of u+25cb) were overstruck >>> unexpectedly. >>> And there are other characters also, which are similarly overstruck. >> This is a Windows bug. Mintty clearly instruct Windows to apply equidistant spacing to achieve fixed-width character cell behaviour. But for certain character ranges, Windows ignores that. Another example for such misbehaviour is the Tibetan block (U+0F00-U+0FFF). Mintty could work around that by rendering characters separately, at a significant penalty for output speed however. Or it could do that only for affected ranges, but criteria to identify them are obscure. > Thank you, Thomas. > > I tried some earlier versions of mintty: > > * mintty-3.1.0-1 has the same issue > * mintty-2.9.6-0 works expectedly in this case. My previous comment was wrong, sorry. The cause of the issue is that the Windows CJK fonts are designed for CJK ambiguous-wide layout. If you run mintty with option Charwidth=ambig-wide, or better in an ambiguous-wide locale like LC_CTYPE=C DOT utf8 AT cjkwide, width handling and font rendering will match. Mintty applies auto-narrowing to some characters that would render far out of their character cell, squeezing them into the cell, in order to optimise the trade-off between readability and authentic rendering. Some character ranges were taken out of that mechanism in 2.9.7, including the Geometric Shapes which you've encountered, in this case because they are "geometric" and the assumption was that they should not be tampered for rendering. Thomas -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple