X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 25E0439D5C0D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1619092845; bh=LscvbN4iD/4O6vV7rRZVnMWhw2Tx5L1Y6MZmxxSmTEY=; h=To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=IXalYFYP0S4HSTe19bRJ24CreQ7g9smwwM/0SLWbBHbkGiPf2h4EUq04bBhWQBM7U xCA0OpGOd3YOjg1vbiOoSRrshg/9SfC6UmQs8jtihX0NVEJdmbhMg2bB4K9lfujZnA WvLJvdKms6XON4vDoBkic+bbvuroE1qH6JEQpOIc= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org E956E39D5C02 To: References: <002e01d73751$e5066840$af1338c0$@uni-bremen.de> <513e44a6-50da-1851-f2db-9c3b1900805b AT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: <513e44a6-50da-1851-f2db-9c3b1900805b@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Chances for llvm / clang update? Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:00:32 +0200 Message-ID: <003e01d7376f$1912a9b0$4b37fd10$@uni-bremen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Content-Language: de Thread-Index: AQHba/VPepq+y+Y4NJ10IQPH2C4wZQJMEIeiqqWicwA= X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Andreas Heckel via Cygwin Reply-To: Andreas Heckel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Cygwin" > From: Andrey Repin > Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2021 11:47 AM > > https://cygwin.com/packaging-contributors-guide.html is a good > start, I think. See below... > From: Marco Atzeri > Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2021 1:11 PM > > have you started looking to the current cygwin source package > and > patches for hints and guidance ? Thank you for your kind hints. :) > Unfortunately the package is without maintainer, and volunteers > to take > over are lacking. I was not sure on this part. Good to know, for now I was not expecting anything, just being curious. But since I am interested, I will spent some time to look into it at some point. Although I feel not very confident achieving much with my limited knowledge. I will get back to you, once I have concrete questions I can articulate. Cheers, Andreas -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple