X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 94DC83951C4D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1618341241;
	bh=Kjf0xOsbZL5KByoeEgyoBStTn2QdNFki9LcvEkZwpBI=;
	h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	 List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	 From;
	b=JSuYcaOvuF9y42sFeOpxsHJwaYqcYEnSj14G4pKMKO91nH9LEGemH5lGaKv3pvMui
	 VT7mxo0DJAm7kz3RJwmCJKtJBkPS40ok6JwCLW9Xye8P9ecW1mJEOUImMLm50+t28X
	 n/0G0PYRqLDeSRAb+roxr04+ts9oSLcvGk8XEmB4=
X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 88A5C394C046
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:newsgroups:references:from:message-id
 :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=M83u6xhMWumag5Oww8LrRvkKafJ1WKKYD007qKvAzaE=;
 b=AAIfsS8kvR5mYQYofixYuQtHu5ZIyO3vzdNR0j2CKNaA431RwoF6eqs5eggWiQ7cHd
 +DocuT3UmK6QhTT8PfYmvyuUNZHMUjS8AeY4+BsE5n0LctAUgzqJtzpInAJ3xbjyes0W
 aCZCPtmHMyrz5C99EUibKs5DHJY3CMpTFF0Tp0uj3Q85wjvH4LjmkUSKs0Eq4YYHZxy+
 xDRAoX639oxfjAhH35yF/+MmtbjZQPyWUwVqT0UEDUL7IAHyguvvTK5z9ZySw9oW6HUi
 Dr+daNYJZvvUp9yA9KbQ2bzfV0yxCDm+vuyFmJEo5qdRPfmGOF20tlfD2juVduIaX8bU
 h7sA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531dOjV7qI7DiHtFnKIs/qgXgax6Qed/6w+i+uvSOFVnY+81lpjc
 6Ps9ACuGiW9wmIEfXNNh3Bx0ADhOhEI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyKhQIZPU/EiNGuhcD1unG6hew5uwI4uEZiK1t0ELLbM86+7UOX2Je8Ch1TqKphJrhfyQGtGg==
X-Received: by 2002:aca:d653:: with SMTP id n80mr1107098oig.21.1618341238862; 
 Tue, 13 Apr 2021 12:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: cgdb fails with cygwin 3.2.0 but is OK with 3.1.6
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Newsgroups: gmane.os.cygwin
References: <alpine DOT WNT DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 2104131455150 DOT 56864 AT panamint>
 <alpine DOT WNT DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 2104131951470 DOT 93188 AT panamint>
Message-ID: <90c72430-8eb6-8132-0728-0afe20e48a0c@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 14:13:57 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19)
 Gecko/20081209 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.WNT.2.00.2104131951470.93188@panamint>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_NUMSUBJECT,
 NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From: =?utf-8?q?Ren=C3=A9_Berber_via_Cygwin?= <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ren=c3=a9_Berber?= <rene DOT berber AT gmail DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id 13DJE3fZ018665

On 4/13/2021 1:56 PM, Arthur Norman via Cygwin wrote:
> René Berber wrote
>> At one time it was recommended to disable a Cygwin feature, something
>> like this:
>> alias cgdb="env CYGWIN=disable_pcon cgdb"
>> Not sure if this is still necesary.
> 
> Thank you for the reminder about that. I had forgotten - however ion my 
> main Windows machine I have the CYGWIN variable set like that all the 
> time and in the VM that I tried with it is not - and in both cases cgdb 
> seems to behave well on the slightly old version of the cygwin package 
> but failed with the latest. So I do not think that is the issue here and 
> I might live advice as to whether I can now remove that setting of CYGWIN!

Probably.  And since you don't see any difference then that's proof that 
is no longer needed (in this case).

Sorry I couldn't be of more help, haven't used cgdb in a while.
-- 
R.Berber


--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple