X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C39EE386F41E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1616155568; bh=Bh8VvFlIy5FtAAJS7mlB9a9CmaMdY4H4sj59G9iP5LA=; h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=clwSsLLPEkitPA4zoFd7de4M1zacgCOyTShDMQJsPzVnVD0iMnwcJ5mmA+byIhRnU JmiZ0rX4ZhgYPlPRB3OTgyx2gid4EgTNwecMbMsG4XJLxgDUp43xZzFy+blU4vHTSX tYOafU08spslsd3Ic0Ie0Nuk0U1uC/BGlma2lkK4= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org C99BC385041E DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-06.nifty.com 12JC5iBI004672 X-Nifty-SrcIP: [118.243.84.61] Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 21:05:46 +0900 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: stdin pipe rename in 3.2.0 Message-Id: <20210319210546.a1871ac954d695bceaeb079b@nifty.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <20210319190807.babb0c0312740f44e9119c17@nifty.ne.jp> References: <20210319190807 DOT babb0c0312740f44e9119c17 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Takashi Yano via Cygwin Reply-To: Takashi Yano Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 19:08:07 +0900 Takashi Yano wrote: > Corinna, is it possble to apply the patch for 3.2.0 release? By the way, duaring testing https://github.com/k-takata/ptycheck, I noticed _get_osfhandle() does not work properly for stdout and stderr. Shouldn't this extern "C" long _get_osfhandle (int fd) { long res; cygheap_fdget cfd (fd); if (cfd >= 0) res = (long) cfd->get_handle (); else res = -1; syscall_printf ("%R = get_osfhandle(%d)", res, fd); return res; } be extern "C" long _get_osfhandle (int fd) { long res; cygheap_fdget cfd (fd); if (cfd >= 0) { if (fd == 1 || fd == 2) res = (long) cfd->get_output_handle_cyg (); else res = (long) cfd->get_handle_cyg (); } else res = -1; syscall_printf ("%R = get_osfhandle(%d)", res, fd); return res; } ? -- Takashi Yano -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple