X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4923F384A026
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
s=default; t=1614992848;
bh=sTUFBQpLhUSCQ6UVSNsqFxFp5zaodnGIy1Ou/tFK4Hs=;
h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
From;
b=FaUlzBRXoigdkMWqzF9RWonE7qUdyiaNf/9uWPsBo6s9L6FS0yGD9K95rLy2S1Gay
6XpEQonhX2dfYi5LOvSOV0XvqoozxysiHATIFPR9JdozUCBBWxoxBpf4vDraPyhYh/
njHFLVhrxs9gADH8cE3xI3sUM4wWxPfnuy45GiuI=
X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 71F643857010
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-01.nifty.com 12616mK9018188
X-Nifty-SrcIP: [118.243.85.178]
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 10:06:57 +0900
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: stack grow direction wrongly detected
Message-Id: <20210306100657.135a86aacf935a7f9e9a7847@nifty.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To: <b9285d42-1400-dabf-83a5-2e244f1efe81@gmail.com>
References: <6eded5d3-93f3-7c98-5055-ee5ac2566bc8 AT gmail DOT com>
<cb59246a-5dd9-b45d-96da-45ba392b2978 AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
<b9285d42-1400-dabf-83a5-2e244f1efe81 AT gmail DOT com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
<mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From: Takashi Yano via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 21:29:49 +0100
Marco Atzeri wrote:
> guile 1.8.8 is 10 years old, but it is still used by some programs
> as all the guile 2.x series were slower.
> the code on recent guile 3.0.x is different, with no recursion at all.
>
> SCM_I_GSC_STACK_GROWS_UP=0
> AC_RUN_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE(
> [AC_INCLUDES_DEFAULT
> int
> find_stack_direction (int *addr, int depth)
> {
> int dir, dummy = 0;
> if (! addr)
> addr = &dummy;
> *addr = addr < &dummy ? 1 : addr == &dummy ? 0 : -1;
> dir = depth ? find_stack_direction (addr, depth - 1) : 0;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This calls find_stack_direction() recursively, isn't it?
> return dir + dummy;
> }
>
> int
> main (int argc, char **argv)
> {
> return find_stack_direction (0, argc + !argv + 20) < 0;
> }])],
Recursion depth seems to be increased to more than 20.
--
Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple