X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 740323885C0B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1614882771;
	bh=9IuzBLz500cbOdkBs4wihx4N3NBV47MeQ/alf80OY94=;
	h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	 List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc:
	 From;
	b=oOYHeHTg3Wrm6Q9B7u3FkvD8Itemlx1WkuYdmWU4GJ5/x3K7MXp1FxbHLAHPAdlnI
	 hGEsg+5AJ70I7m3yl0niJL843fpsUCPRzJrcmwQ1EVQSrd4ihHw+gzz4jW7fbrVdyQ
	 kdbOQdW3UBlgjDCkMkptUeBZqC1mYBXzxGtosuJw=
X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 91DED382D83E
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date
 :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=R3hWcwO4P/ioFDitH6XjO394Oc+r+1Przvcl36JBaiA=;
 b=WaW5FlUmBkcU9PRR3fRBCKqgERpAaOCv+9Fulqmo2A0+2I7pZ75m6j2FnuSSH3zWTd
 C7FXnLcwwKyION0/QzrKMGIpRID1kzBfnr6vjbKHqadADXFQZbnmQbzZu+F0SrcLYyIl
 r4P/90KgmILiQc1BuRVbDeZcoVqDyNNIL3A6S/TUH2dTIPwskMi5QsAUl+6mJZCYW68F
 fYWlSGbXPPlsMMKspSS5FzfGaGwu1rXJmM9awwmXs9lH9WYYrTNQiix7bxUqgayrPke0
 nL416TVq3D3v2kr/PEcjQ14KOuqDMB1cWwgF6ODjRx6nw/Ww3S+QgjKGblFeG4Wf1gIQ
 VhpQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532970YbSkMOyGuL8249Tsy/z0Py2LqVxDiNBloJXQU3Ny1eUP31
 qqynyqcGBqIOjpsS4MCZpKM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJys28NqRCDVnkYs4GUE+KdYQs66wnTrnfgikiHKcj2I5r/p0xO/9nc0YQKiuPF5zs6btXP7Ng==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d4d2:: with SMTP id t18mr5946195edr.342.1614882767627; 
 Thu, 04 Mar 2021 10:32:47 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Cygwin now on Python 3? What about Mercurial?
To: Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <CANV2+nVF4QyWL1LVkD38=u4gJVqFN_GpC6y965TQuoscxH=0SQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <CAB8Xom93f9eDswLiCPxUxXuw9Dq0SK6BPooeBy5BFBxWsK75PQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <fb364670-8757-ce44-0197-d848d5ad9077 AT cornell DOT edu>
Message-ID: <b36b971e-e5a1-c5e9-40be-031158ea6b48@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 19:32:45 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <fb364670-8757-ce44-0197-d848d5ad9077@cornell.edu>
Content-Language: it
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From: Marco Atzeri via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: Marco Atzeri <marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com>
Cc: Jari Aalto <jari DOT aalto AT cante DOT net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 124IWu1v025603

On 04.03.2021 16:19, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> On 3/4/2021 6:05 AM, marco atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 10:27 AM Russell VT via Cygwin  wrote:
>>>
>>> Cygwin Enthusiasts!
>>>
>>> Well, I was going to hold back on this one, but having now watched 
>>> the list
>>> for a bit, I think this is a fair question (feel free to smack me if I'm
>>> feeling too entitled, albeit maybe a bit on the rambling side).
>>>
>>> TLDR; Cygwin 64 Mercurial (5.5.1) blows chunks with default Python 
>>> install.
>>> I'm still not sure if this is a package dependency error, given the 
>>> recent
>>> Python 2.7 Deprecation "worldwide," or the way that Mercurial is 
>>> packaged,
>>> or even if the package installation order on-down the line screwed me 
>>> up at
>>> some point in the past.
>>>
>>> TLDR2; Am I really the "only" one on Cygwin still using Mercurial in a
>>> Complex Python Environment?
>>>
>>> Here;s my primary operating environment, devoid of whatever tricks I may
>>> try to play with Python Development environments (read: Path to /usr/bin
>>> with no funny stuff getting in the way)
>>> .
>>
>> Hi Russel,
>>
>> short term solution is the same mentioned here
>> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/cygwin/2021-January/247657.html
>>
>> It seems the current package maintainer for Mercurial is not available 
>> for
>> the upgrade from 2.7 to 3.8.
>> We need to decide how to proceed
> 
> The Mercurial maintainer (Jari) doesn't always follow the mailing list.  
> I've added him to the CC.
> 
> Ken

Thanks Ken,

I already tried that route on Cygwin-apps
I am afraid he is out of reach, hoping nothing serious happened.


https://sourceware.org/pipermail/cygwin-apps/2021-February/041088.html

REgards
Marco




--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple