DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org E151B388CC03
Subject: Re: Random assembler errors after update
 mingw64-x86_64-binutils-2.35.2-1
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <announce DOT 87o8h52pnz DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>
 <f4d1da5f-897f-0b81-f474-65725c8bf1df AT yahoo DOT de>
Message-ID: <8bc9c083-5469-4492-0391-89cb9731c737@yahoo.de>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 20:04:41 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f4d1da5f-897f-0b81-f474-65725c8bf1df@yahoo.de>
Content-Language: de-DE
Precedence: list
From: Michael Soegtrop via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: Michael Soegtrop <MSoegtrop AT yahoo DOT de>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

An update on this:

I reverted to the previous version of MinGW 64 binutils in our CI and 
didn't have issues since then.

Best regards,

Michael

Am 01/02/2021 um 10:25 schrieb Michael Soegtrop:
> Hi Achim,
>
> I have some evidence that this update leads to random assembler 
> errors. I have 3 CI failures (out of 5 runs) since the update in an 
> open source project I maintain. The failure is always an error from 
> the MinGW 64 assembler and the errors are random - that is if I rerun 
> the same CI test the error went away in one of one tested case and in 
> the failing cases the error happened compiling different files.
>
> I haven't seen anything like this before the update.
>
> Here are links to one failing and one good case:
>
> Fail run package version:
> https://github.com/coq/platform/runs/1803203762?check_suite_focus=true#step:4:164 
>
>
> Fail run error message:
> https://github.com/coq/platform/runs/1803203762?check_suite_focus=true#step:4:1664 
>
>
> Good run package version:
> https://github.com/coq/platform/runs/1799374171?check_suite_focus=true#step:4:164 
>
>
> I will revert to the old version of the package and see if the errors 
> go away.
>
> The 32 bit version seems fine do far.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Michael
--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple