X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 5E96C385783A Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tlinx.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin AT tlinx DOT org Message-ID: <5F57CF4B.308@tlinx.org> Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:36:59 -0700 From: L A Walsh User-Agent: Thunderbird MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "JohnBush AT EMail DOT com" , "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" Subject: Re: Bash 4.4.12-3 erroneous behavior using [[ -f name ]] and other utilities References: <72243122-9da4-1631-4912-04580c70ea3c AT EMail DOT com> In-Reply-To: <72243122-9da4-1631-4912-04580c70ea3c@EMail.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Cygwin" What are you complaining about? What erroneous behavior? We can't read your mind, but it isn't clear what you think is going wrong -- so how are we supposed to figure out what the erroneous behavior is? Please give an example of what you think is wrong and what you expected instead. Please be clear enough that your own mother and father would clearly understand the problem. Also, is there a reason you submitted this to the cygwin list instead of the bug-bash AT gnu DOT org list? On 9/7/2020 11:24 PM, JohnBush AT EMail DOT com wrote: .... -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple