X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 09113386F02B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1587413366;
	bh=wL3bOHmGRj4aq657cegBzr90b4gVgNS4LKfIPRv7SZs=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:
	 List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:
	 From;
	b=KmpXiVFLKQCju1Y9i0zpi50C9py5WeChw7HkXwFyXHjRVACkeKONS57EkfvzGFuMT
	 CWdKOq3uzXbQTm7HYTMXJZiNwbkadlAxOdYRtDZuKG2MVCMHWwksiu+1MtNSI0RUWg
	 4eV+Rdjt+V3+ckhVQ9yRjml9UgQ+pU1P7+B8SUMQ=
X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org A7F64386F021
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail
 smtp.mailfrom=cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 cgf.cx 3788E40145
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-CGF-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 spammy=joining,
 H*r:unknown, H*M:cgf, convenient
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:09:21 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Two naive questions
Message-ID: <20200420200921.GA10790@cgf.cx>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Bill Stewart <bstewart AT iname DOT com>
References: <AM6PR03MB52826CC0B63C6E551642D677A4D80 AT AM6PR03MB5282 DOT eurprd03 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com>
 <d1ba5f73-a234-4583-68bb-36993ad307bc AT gmail DOT com>
 <20200417174902 DOT GA32412 AT iguana DOT crashland DOT org>
 <169450016 DOT 20200417211620 AT yandex DOT ru>
 <fdd6abe0-8448-05f0-9257-8f1c79fdacde AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
 <20200420172017 DOT GA17660 AT iguana DOT crashland DOT org>
 <CANV9t=R1URyQBV4PQR+neua7ZEahS1TA496MASRn6BRZ4OpcDQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANV9t=R1URyQBV4PQR+neua7ZEahS1TA496MASRn6BRZ4OpcDQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FORGED_SPF_HELO,
 JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS, SPF_HELO_PASS,
 SPF_NEUTRAL, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:41:32AM -0600, Bill Stewart wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:20 AM Stephen Carrier wrote:
>>I think the OP's first question was asking how to effectively join an
>>existing thread when one is browsing the recent archives and not
>>subscribed to the list.
>>
>>Joining the list after seeing a question one would like to answer
>>doesn't help, because the message you would like to respond to has
>>already gone by.
>>
>>I think a good solution would be to get the message number from the web
>>archive and request that a particular message be sent to you.  Then you
>>could respond to that message and join the thread properly.
>>
>>However, there doesn't seem to be a way to do that.  I used to be
>>notified how to retrieve messages I had missed (due to bouncing) but
>>the method did not work.  Furthermore, the mailman faq doesn't mention
>>any way to do this.
>
>I would say that this is a side-effect of using a mailing list when
>what's really being asked for is a discussion forum.
>
>A mailing list is convenient for self-subscription and replies, but
>replying to a past message (one that's "already gone by" as stated
>above) is not really possible (that I know of?).  Starting a new
>message to the list with an identical subject to an existing thread
>doesn't reply to the existing thread but rather starts a new thread
>with an identical subject (since the thread ID is different).

With mailman, if you click on a message in the archives and then click
on the email address at the top, your mail client of choice will be
opened with correct "In-Reply-To" set.  If you want to reply to the list
then replace the "To" with the email address of the mailing list.  You
can also download the mailbox-formatted archive, read it with a client
like "mutt" and reply that way.

OTOH, most message boards have a way to freeze old discussions and
discourage resurrecting dead threads.  The archives obviously don't
allow that so you might want to consider if your resurrection of an old
discussion would really be appreciated.  If the discussion is old it's
probably best to start a new thread and maybe include a link to the
archive.

But, really, if you want to be part of an active discussion then join
the mailing list.

--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple