X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 68015385DC00 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1587230801; bh=RrqGVmN96i2E70jILR+2tC2BRT2leyfW1RheTHPUvqU=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=yZ1I2cOS+gerfwoINPaWabzqqtMNz6TrZVTmQzbGROTon3QdxBH4XEBh/gV1zf3IN QFckopmUWfQP39TKd/9ys3oQatjaezlBULfH2/y+7S+x57OJ8W5mfRPhUqOonxLt73 r9xJN7ETgv4V5BwOKq5uqmudIaIDreP2/wHg+gCY= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 21B9C385B835 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=//CYvVX/0qffPs7aRuu3802dy7KxphWAoTfb1yj1kVA=; b=S3ri8fwInEe6q6n0byiMaXunE7rALWlEdDA6VUEoRyu6kgcNb+336J3aeJcciGWG6+ gV7CBSJ8w5jJY8m5/+xwhnlmEAFkgl40j7OX7DUiP/T7IVGvXuWcsXFDeWJi8gzV7bKX dpp/mHydN/YteFabDE60zJqKW7mb0dRBMbWIYyLVK6I0gaE+VYa2G4ZKbkGnamkL8XbF k8WieJRRF9dqOAorvyYOncTlLsu2KS/Kkp2UF7isk2WUe+WwLHqo+Qj3RYTo8IYvzPl+ 9byLyRNOAyJ8NJX6Zp5Er44EjaPM0ZzeP/itEy5N8AThyUtQ2K6vSyx5zH2eTnfWvsM3 ReYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Pub7F0xr0tFkQKobCzcb6qD1EGvf27Oa7tQH86yJqTOM4OkguJsc OkkUNbAKxjWSTjCBwRLV9WgJJuGysEqk9/jubqc+ofwP X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJt/eJS2HjCDpj9xgdURFFXEqkPIepjpF7MqPMjLQoFMG4Za4hKM3VIN42obIg+JPfFKDDC+vn5cxwHZOlb8kQ= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a40b:: with SMTP id p11mr5143783ljn.173.1587230795381; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 10:26:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 13:26:24 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Help To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, GIT_PATCH_2, HTML_MESSAGE, KAM_BADIPHTTP, NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: William de la Vega via Cygwin Reply-To: William de la Vega Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Cygwin" Help On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 11:42 wrote: > Send Cygwin mailing list submissions to > cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Cygwin digest..." > Today's Topics: > > 1. Bug with Windows 10 console (akiki AT free DOT fr) > 2. [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: neomutt-20200417-1 > (Federico Kircheis via Cygwin-announce) > 3. Re: Bug with Windows 10 console (Thomas Wolff) > 4. Re: setup-x86_64.exe --quiet-mode issues using Management > Tools (Jon Turney) > 5. open write descriptor on named pipe sometime results in > ENOENT (sten DOT kristian DOT ivarsson AT gmail DOT com) > 6. Re: katomic and atomix will not run (Phoenix Soul) > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: akiki AT free DOT fr > To: cygwin > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 14:42:16 +0200 (CEST) > Subject: Bug with Windows 10 console > Hi, > To day, all programs are upgraded permanently. A good and a bad thing. > Windows 10, cygwin ... > One recent upgrade, I don't target exactly which one, has broken my > environment. > > > Current versions as reported by cygcheck : > Windows 10 Professional Ver 10.0 Build 18363 > cygwin 3.1.4-1 OK > bash 4.4.12-3 OK > > I am using 2 kinds of console to interact with cygwin > mintty : using pty as TTY > bash under cmd : using cons as TTY > > These two were working correctly until recently, but now only mintty stay > correct. > -- in reality it's seems > The principal difference is about Ctrl-C interaction. > With the 2nd kind of TTY, a same program using curses, on Ctrl-c > interrupt the program > give me a prompt > but the terminal stay in curses mode, ie without echo and bad new line > I have to do "reset" (/bin/reset) to restore the terminal > > So the interrupt handling has changed. > Who is responsible. > > I had a look about the new Window Console Legacy. > With this new console, we saw a black screen with color bash prompt. > > So with bash, is it possible to work with one or other TTY mode ? > > Howto understand this problem and what can I do to correct it. > mintty present some problems with my environment and because of that I use > the second form of TTY. > > Sorry for my bad English. > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Federico Kircheis via Cygwin-announce > To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 15:50:16 +0200 > Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: neomutt-20200417-1 > Version 20200417-1 of neomutt has been uploaded. > > The command line mail reader neomutt reached version 20200417. > > On GitHub it is possible to find the changelog for the new release: > https://github.com/neomutt/neomutt/releases > > Federico > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Thomas Wolff > To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 16:05:54 +0200 > Subject: Re: Bug with Windows 10 console > Am 18.04.2020 um 14:42 schrieb akiki AT free DOT fr: > > Hi, > Bonjour > > To day, all programs are upgraded permanently. A good and a bad thing. > > Windows 10, cygwin ... > > One recent upgrade, I don't target exactly which one, has broken my > environment. > > > > > > Current versions as reported by cygcheck : > > Windows 10 Professional Ver 10.0 Build 18363 > > cygwin 3.1.4-1 OK > > bash 4.4.12-3 OK > > > > I am using 2 kinds of console to interact with cygwin > > mintty : using pty as TTY > > bash under cmd : using cons as TTY > > > > These two were working correctly until recently, but now only mintty > stay correct. > > -- in reality it's seems > > The principal difference is about Ctrl-C interaction. > > With the 2nd kind of TTY, a same program using curses, on Ctrl-c > > interrupt the program > > give me a prompt > > but the terminal stay in curses mode, ie without echo and bad new line > > I have to do "reset" (/bin/reset) to restore the terminal > > > > So the interrupt handling has changed. > > Who is responsible. > It might help if you tell us *which* program behaves like that. > > > > I had a look about the new Window Console Legacy. > > With this new console, we saw a black screen with color bash prompt. > > > > So with bash, is it possible to work with one or other TTY mode ? > > > > Howto understand this problem and what can I do to correct it. > > mintty present some problems with my environment and because of that I > use the second form of TTY. > Which problems? > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Jon Turney > To: The Cygwin Mailing List > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 15:58:11 +0100 > Subject: Re: setup-x86_64.exe --quiet-mode issues using Management Tools > On 15/04/2020 16:02, KAVALAGIOS Panagiotis (EEAS-EXT) wrote: > >> From: Cygwin On Behalf Of Paul Isaacson > >> Hello Cygwin Support, > >> > >> I am trying to install Cygwin silently through a management tool like > SCCM > >> (called Bigfix). I went through the FAQ on your website to see what > >> commands/switches existed. I would like to install silently without any > user > >> interaction and so I attempted to use setup-x86_64.exe --quiet-mode and > I > >> get into an infinite loop for the installation. Bigfix tells me that > the installation > >> is waiting for user response and will not continue. It gets stuck and > can't > >> start/finish the installation. Is there any suggestions on what I can > try? I also > >> want to install a bunch of packages during the installation but thought > I would > >> try to start at a completely silent installation firsts. > > It's possible that there are bugs in setup which cause quiet-mode to get > stuck on some error conditions. > > Unfortunately, there's not enough information provided to know if that's > the case here, or fix it if it is. > > >> I have also checked forums as well online to see if anyone else had > issues. I > >> found a one forum where someone is having the same issue with no > >> resolution found here: https://www.itninja.com/question/cygwin-realy- > >> silent-installation-no-progress-window-with-option-to-counsel > > > > Welcome to the club. Unfortunately, Cygwin setup is not friendly for > Software Managers. After a lot of research, I have ended up to the > following command: > > > > ---------------- > > @echo off > > @echo Starting Cygwin installation > > > > "%cd%\setup-x86_64.exe" -q -A -L -l "%cd%\cygwin-repo" -R "C:\Program > Files\Cygwin" -P > autoconf,automake,bash-completion,binutils,curl,emacs,git,git-svn,gnupg2,inetutils,konsole,mc,openssh,patchutils,perl,python2,python3,rsync,ruby,subversion,tcsh,tmux,unzip,vim,vim-common,wget,xinit,xlaunch,xorg-server,xorg-server-common,xorg-server-xorg,xorg-x11-fonts-dpi100,xorg-x11-fonts-dpi75,xorg-x11-fonts-Type1,xorg-x11-fonts-misc,xterm,zip > > ---------------- > > > > wrapped in a nice "setup-x86_64.bat" that is executed by the > installation Powershell script. That command is still popping up a progress > window, but it was removed by our Landesk configuration. You may check if > yours having the same option not to allow any GUI to be displayed by the > installation program. > > > > I have already requested a feature to totally remove any GUI from silent > installation: > > > > https://www.mail-archive.com/cygwin AT cygwin DOT com/msg162887.html > > > > Yeah, about that... > > If you want to see a feature added to setup, by far the best way is to > provide a patch to add it. > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: > To: > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 17:24:28 +0200 > Subject: open write descriptor on named pipe sometime results in ENOENT > Hey all > > > We're trying to nail down some issues with using named pipes > > The issue we're getting is deterministic (ENXIO) but it is not this one, > but > we think this issue is worth reporting anyway > > > We're using the branch topic/fifo > > > > The program explained in short is: > > > - One main (parent) pipe that lives through the whole execution > > - The main process forks 'children' child-processes that creates their own > (unique) named pipes > > - Each child forks 'children' grans-child-processes that just writes some > bogus messages back to the unique child pipe > > - Each child writes a bogus message back to the main process > > - Every process creates a write and a read descriptor, but the write > descriptor is just a dummy descriptor (to somehow keep the pipe alive > without being bombarded with signals) > > - This iterates a few times > > > Some of the constructs may be a bit confusing and maybe not relevant to > this > issue, but I left them in the test-program anyway > > > > > Issue #1 sometimes occurs in line 35 (printed as 36) we get ENOENT (No such > file or directory) despite that the pipe was just created and the read > descriptor successfully was opened > > *wfd = open(name, O_WRONLY); > > > Issue #2 sometimes occurs in line 73 (printed as 74) we get EBUSY (Device > or > resource busy) when attempting to open a non blocking descriptor > > const int wfd = open(name, O_WRONLY | O_NONBLOCK); > > > Issue #3 sometimes occurs somewhere unknown and the main process just get > stuck (I've failed to reproduced that with strace or so) and to not have > any > more input so maybe this should be left out ? > > > > I hope this is well described and hopefully it's enough to reproduce the > issue(s) and hopefully is not due to a fault test case ;-) > > > > Kristian > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Phoenix Soul > To: moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu > Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Bcc: > Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 08:40:28 -0700 > Subject: Re: katomic and atomix will not run > No, I haven't. What is it and how do I run one? > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 3:23 PM Eliot Moss wrote: > > > On 4/17/2020 5:16 PM, Phoenix Soul via Cygwin wrote: > > > I decided that I was going to get katomic and atomix for cygwin, and > > > selected the most recent version listed. > > > atomix refuses to run and says: > > > Unable to init server: Could not connect to 127.0.0.1: Connection > > refused > > > > > > (atomix:1495): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: > > > katomic says: > > > QStandardPaths: XDG_RUNTIME_DIR not set, defaulting to > > > '/tmp/runtime-warri_000' > > > qt.qpa.screen: QXcbConnection: Could not connect to display > > > Could not connect to any X display. > > > I have already tried using source as well. I have already pinged > > 127.0.0.1 > > > (localhost) to ensure that it does exist. What must be done to fix it. > > > Windows version is 8.1, and this is a no admin installation. > > > > ... and you have an X server already running? Maybe some details > > about that end of things will help folks help you ... > > > > Eliot Moss > > > > > -- > From, Warrick > > -- > Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple