X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 873E63B35130
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cs.umass.edu
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu
Subject: Re: Why is taskset still not in util-linux?
To: Roumen Petrov <bugtrack AT roumenpetrov DOT info>, cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <1348011a-261a-2a87-d361-4e51fa8dc19f AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
 <85ae12aa-6cc3-5d4c-5df2-25bf811ec6a9 AT maxrnd DOT com>
 <72fea68a-b3d7-e87c-726f-8a5a2587a992 AT maxrnd DOT com>
 <01e3d337-e5fe-f393-7634-3f1881bca315 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
 <dca24f26-9da9-591c-19c1-8020e5de3a4e AT maxrnd DOT com>
 <79d7afa5-a07b-04df-c259-b76c61390f8c AT maxrnd DOT com>
 <c075b981d41ff880e0af76c853e764c468b9c6de DOT camel AT cygwin DOT com>
 <dd8104f5-4a76-1ff3-f769-69154991aa80 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
 <f50b2040-c29f-9983-9bce-d1c33fb4bae7 AT maxrnd DOT com>
 <4c782f2b-c9f0-cd81-cb8d-f874ddc92fa8 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
 <b9a74f8a-93cb-bc57-e970-60503a4e064b AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
 <95b3be49-8842-35d3-faab-7fb053201d8f AT roumenpetrov DOT info>
From: Eliot Moss <moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
Message-ID: <895c7fa2-62af-efce-97d7-9813c5f54e26@cs.umass.edu>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 19:13:19 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <95b3be49-8842-35d3-faab-7fb053201d8f@roumenpetrov.info>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cygwin mailing list <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

On 3/21/2020 10:26 AM, Roumen Petrov wrote:
 > Eliot Moss wrote:
 >> So here's a thing, though I don't understand it:
 >>
 >> In addition the build/taskset.exe, there's a build/.libs/taskset.exe.
 >> If I install the latter in /usr/bin/.libs/taskset.exe, then /usr/bin/taskset
 >> works.  In fact, it seems that the version in .libs is the "real" program
 >> and /usr/bin/taskset is some kind of trampoline (?) to it?
 > Libtool wrapper is shell script on Unix/Linux and executable on Microsoft Windows OS. Goal of
 > "wrapper" is to prepare environment in the way that allows to run real executable without 
installation.
 > Project that creates just one executable is not the beast sample but think for a library project and
 > a bundle of tests (executable). All tests must load library from build tree.
 >
 >
 >>
 >> In fact, a stripped version of build/.libs/taskset installed in /usr/bin
 >> works just fine.  There must be some kind of build and install convention
 >> going on that I am not familiar with.  (I'm not familiar with a lot of
 >> these build processes, actually.)
 > I think that in some cases this executable has to be relinked. Definitely not on Microsoft Windows
 > OS. So on cygwin it is "final" executable.

Thanks - I start to get the picture.  What is odd is that 'cygport install'
puts the _wrapper_ into /usr/bin rather than the executable, and does not
install the exectable.  The wrapper just silently fails.  Now maybe if I built
the package (as if I were the package maintainer) and installed that with
cygwin's setup, I would get the right thing - not sure (and not 100% sure how
to do that).

Cheers - EM
--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple