X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 13525385C019 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=roumenpetrov.info Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bugtrack AT roumenpetrov DOT info DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=roumenpetrov.info; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender: Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=RCZvKIt3sTjYnxL6UHzJz/MJl3olZleUcwH4SuXlOqU=; b=Gg2LU2NYVyPai5yVZ0UW0LcmbD YIajZqlKxrQmMTskMoCovUqEYCsBTriqJhyZpG1lAjAeI5PqcHn4WGzR4KHs+U68iuUp/dFFFlNpW qO0Q7Hb+XSDZp4t5jeIdeksq83v0xYgbcWPO18WlDyM5+P2cpQ/FU4DSP30cdUgQ6e4L97XoTmOON mFCFGIrX398MRemzPz8g3dOOSLfMSl37Mds58+QVEX5YoLRgjjEjpbXU+PsGeoF9gjhwjDnISjs80 cVaU8PmdUirQOaB1vd8CF6nCaf8Owpavjwxy9tQiLrpCrgjIrBSH1hrNVKZz/llFciiIrto0YCkwP 4sjZETjw==; Subject: Re: Why is taskset still not in util-linux? To: cygwin References: <1348011a-261a-2a87-d361-4e51fa8dc19f AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> <85ae12aa-6cc3-5d4c-5df2-25bf811ec6a9 AT maxrnd DOT com> <72fea68a-b3d7-e87c-726f-8a5a2587a992 AT maxrnd DOT com> <01e3d337-e5fe-f393-7634-3f1881bca315 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> <79d7afa5-a07b-04df-c259-b76c61390f8c AT maxrnd DOT com> <4c782f2b-c9f0-cd81-cb8d-f874ddc92fa8 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu> From: Roumen Petrov Message-ID: <95b3be49-8842-35d3-faab-7fb053201d8f@roumenpetrov.info> Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 16:26:06 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - rila.superhosting.bg X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - cygwin.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roumenpetrov.info X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: rila.superhosting.bg: authenticated_id: master78 AT roumenpetrov DOT info X-Authenticated-Sender: rila.superhosting.bg: master78 AT roumenpetrov DOT info X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Cygwin mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 02LEQjVN023127 Eliot Moss wrote: > So here's a thing, though I don't understand it: > > In addition the build/taskset.exe, there's a build/.libs/taskset.exe. > If I install the latter in /usr/bin/.libs/taskset.exe, then /usr/bin/taskset > works.  In fact, it seems that the version in .libs is the "real" program > and /usr/bin/taskset is some kind of trampoline (?) to it? Libtool wrapper is shell script on Unix/Linux and executable on Microsoft Windows OS. Goal of "wrapper" is to prepare environment in the way that allows to run real executable without installation. Project that creates just one executable is not the beast sample but think for a library project and a bundle of tests (executable). All tests must load library from build tree. > > In fact, a stripped version of build/.libs/taskset installed in /usr/bin > works just fine.  There must be some kind of build and install convention > going on that I am not familiar with.  (I'm not familiar with a lot of > these build processes, actually.) I think that in some cases this executable has to be relinked. Definitely not on Microsoft Windows OS. So on cygwin it is "final" executable. > > Best - Eliot Regards, Roumen -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple