X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 1023C385C019
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cs.umass.edu
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu
Subject: Re: Why is taskset still not in util-linux?
To: cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <1348011a-261a-2a87-d361-4e51fa8dc19f AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
 <85ae12aa-6cc3-5d4c-5df2-25bf811ec6a9 AT maxrnd DOT com>
 <72fea68a-b3d7-e87c-726f-8a5a2587a992 AT maxrnd DOT com>
 <01e3d337-e5fe-f393-7634-3f1881bca315 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
 <dca24f26-9da9-591c-19c1-8020e5de3a4e AT maxrnd DOT com>
 <79d7afa5-a07b-04df-c259-b76c61390f8c AT maxrnd DOT com>
 <c075b981d41ff880e0af76c853e764c468b9c6de DOT camel AT cygwin DOT com>
 <dd8104f5-4a76-1ff3-f769-69154991aa80 AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
 <f50b2040-c29f-9983-9bce-d1c33fb4bae7 AT maxrnd DOT com>
From: Eliot Moss <moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu>
Message-ID: <4c782f2b-c9f0-cd81-cb8d-f874ddc92fa8@cs.umass.edu>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 06:24:37 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f50b2040-c29f-9983-9bce-d1c33fb4bae7@maxrnd.com>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Cygwin mailing list <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: moss AT cs DOT umass DOT edu
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com>

Dear Mark - I am confused by how your build goes through when configure
detects the ionice does not have the ioprio_set/get calls that it needs.  In my
case configure stops at that point.  That was why I made a patch to
configure.ac so that cygport could explicitly exclude ionice.  At the moment,
I am seeing what happens if I add more "fake" syscalls to syscall.h for those
two calls.  The configure goes through (as expected), but of course ionice
fails to link (no 'syscall" function).

If I revert to having only SYS_sched_getaffinity defined, configure stops
with:

checking for syscall ioprio_set... no
configure: WARNING: Unable to detect syscall ioprio_set.
configure: error: ionice selected but ioprio_set syscall not found
*** ERROR: configure failed

That why I think I/we need some kind of patch to configure.ac.  How does
your build manage to continue?

I am working from the Cygwin util-linux-2.33.1-1 source package.  Is that the
correct one?  Also, I am in the x86-64 world for all this.

Eliot
--
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple