X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=ErBzXGHtIexp56sj Hp0z5or8YyKb+GsiTTurbLtAmnxr6XjO5MwXYR5yquYPkGHzPvDz6R5SlbJOgRoc 1DFXIs+JsEGqCqbNReOqRP0MbBlvkOthGUZIo6J68/LT+osfv23ZEP74PalFVhgO uv2kJ5SYHPvGyt3qX3YTKwDwjBA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=JTPLSBPhRyDtGSipwDRYPa dwdMk=; b=vaArX+H5GZ21WkImjtLHnX29WHXVxmAWUJVpisF/TKaUfJG5KJumSF awblOTiu8kvl0135ZVJzYrvE5AXvdke8vq90qIukGFqtbsp19QFEc3oNiyTpvE4c 1IHjhtYfF6JePKzuoo76bL2b5NQOqIErLANf+oT04UDc0EDfRa91M= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: smtp-out-so.shaw.ca Reply-To: Brian DOT Inglis AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca Subject: Re: GDB and thread To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: From: Brian Inglis Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <5bb42265-9adf-9499-0b94-ab1f2b139e58@SystematicSw.ab.ca> Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 21:38:45 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 2019-12-28 15:28, Marco Atzeri wrote: > Am 28.12.2019 um 23:03 schrieb Ken Brown: >> On 12/28/2019 4:27 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote: >>> I am trying to debug the libuv test failures, >>> but it seems I am not able to convince GDB on stopping >>> just before the failure. >>> >>> Is "thread apply all" working on Cygwin ? >>> The fact that produces no output in comparison to >>> a normal break command is a bit strange >>> >>> (gdb) break test-dlerror.c:34 >>> Breakpoint 1 at 0x10040b0b0: file /pub/devel/libuv/libuv-1.34.0/test/test-dlerro >>> r.c, line 34. >>> (gdb) thread apply all break test-dlerror.c:34 >> >> Others know this better than I do, but I seem to recall that a break command >> automatically applies to all threads.  In other words, "thread apply all" is >> redundant. > > It seems to ignore any break for what I see. > thread apply all was a tentative after simple break was ineffective >>> Any hint will be appreciated >> >> Might this be related to optimization?  That could change the order in which >> lines of code are executed.  Have you tried building without optimization? > > Already thought, but it is built with -ggdb -O0 Recommended to use at least -Og nowadays for better debugging: $ info gcc inv debug "With no '-O' option at all, some compiler passes that collect information useful for debugging do not run at all, so that '-Og' may result in a better debugging experience." -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple